whytofly
/
qt6-bb10
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove executive summary. 

It isn't necessarily that hashing the whole string is the main problem, as the
recently added java string benchmark appears to show, which means the original
purpose of this benchmark is rather voided.

This removal allows gradually repurposing the test towards providing general
benchmarks of QHash performance.

Change-Id: Iaab0a3b493387dcce99240632342235ed9c44d88
Reviewed-by: João Abecasis <joao.abecasis@nokia.com>
bb10
Robin Burchell 2012-01-20 01:28:46 +02:00 committed by Qt by Nokia
parent f61112aa32
commit 47d0813f5b
1 changed files with 0 additions and 27 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
tests/benchmarks/corelib/tools/qhash/main.cpp
View File

@ -39,33 +39,6 @@
**
****************************************************************************/
/*
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This benchmark serves as reality check on the idea that hashing the complete
string is a good idea.
Executive summary: It is not a good idea.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
********* Start testing of tst_QHash *********
Config: Using QTest library 5.0.0, Qt 5.0.0
PASS : tst_QHash::initTestCase()
RESULT : tst_QHash::qhash_qt4():
0.041 msecs per iteration (total: 85, iterations: 2048)
PASS : tst_QHash::qhash_qt4()
RESULT : tst_QHash::qhash_faster():
0.0122 msecs per iteration (total: 100, iterations: 8192)
PASS : tst_QHash::qhash_faster()
PASS : tst_QHash::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 4 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
*/
#include "main.h"
#include <QFile>