Functional fix will come later via separate tasks.
Task-number: QTBUG-122999
Change-Id: Ib805740c87ff21cea5a186add71cc594ab4d4df1
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Now developer build tests compile, but some are not working.
Functional fix will come later via separate tasks.
Task-number: QTBUG-122999
Change-Id: I70487b46c1b32ba4279cb02a4978e4f55ac0d310
Reviewed-by: Alexey Edelev <alexey.edelev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
CMakeLists.txt and .cmake files of significant size
(more than 2 lines according to our check in tst_license.pl)
now have the copyright and license header.
Existing copyright statements remain intact
Task-number: QTBUG-88621
Change-Id: I3b98cdc55ead806ec81ce09af9271f9b95af97fa
Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
When a foreign event loop that does not enter an alertable wait state
is running (which is also the case when a native dialog window is
modal), pipe handlers would freeze temporarily due to their APC
callbacks not being invoked.
We address this problem by moving the I/O callbacks to the Windows
thread pool, and only posting completion events to the main loop
from there. That makes the actual I/O completely independent from
any main loop, while the signal delivery works also with foreign
loops (because Qt event delivery uses Windows messages, which foreign
loops typically handle correctly).
As a nice side effect, performance (and in particular scalability)
is improved.
Several other approaches have been tried:
1) Using QWinEventNotifier was about a quarter slower and scaled much
worse. Additionally, it also required a rather egregious hack to
handle the (pathological) case of a single thread talking to both
ends of a QLocalSocket synchronously.
2) Queuing APCs from the thread pool to the main thread and also
posting wake-up events to its event loop, and handling I/O on the
main thread; this performed roughly like this solution, but scaled
half as well, and the separate wake-up path was still deemed hacky.
3) Only posting wake-up events to the main thread from the thread pool,
and still handling I/O on the main thread; this still performed
comparably to 2), and the pathological case was not handled at all.
4) Using this approach for reads and that of 3) for writes was slightly
faster with big amounts of data, but scaled slightly worse, and the
diverging implementations were deemed not desirable.
Fixes: QTBUG-64443
Change-Id: I66443c3021d6ba98639a214c3e768be97d2cf14b
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
This reverts commit ee122077b0.
Reason for revert: This causes QProcess::readAll() to sometimes
return nothing after the process has ended.
Fixes: QTBUG-88624
Change-Id: I34fa27ae7fb38cc7c3a1e8eb2fdae2a5775584c2
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Paul Wicking <paul.wicking@qt.io>
(cherry picked from commit 23100ee61e33680d20f934dcbc96b57e8da29bf9)
Reviewed-by: Qt Cherry-pick Bot <cherrypick_bot@qt-project.org>
When a foreign event loop that does not enter an alertable wait state
is running (which is also the case when a native dialog window is
modal), pipe handlers would freeze temporarily due to their APC
callbacks not being invoked.
We address this problem by moving the I/O callbacks to the Windows
thread pool, and only posting completion events to the main loop
from there. That makes the actual I/O completely independent from
any main loop, while the signal delivery works also with foreign
loops (because Qt event delivery uses Windows messages, which foreign
loops typically handle correctly).
As a nice side effect, performance (and in particular scalability)
is improved.
Several other approaches have been tried:
1) Using QWinEventNotifier was about a quarter slower and scaled much
worse. Additionally, it also required a rather egregious hack to
handle the (pathological) case of a single thread talking to both
ends of a QLocalSocket synchronously.
2) Queuing APCs from the thread pool to the main thread and also
posting wake-up events to its event loop, and handling I/O on the
main thread; this performed roughly like this solution , but scaled
half as well, and the separate wake-up path was still deemed hacky.
3) Only posting wake-up events to the main thread from the thread pool,
and still handling I/O on the main thread; this still performed
comparably to 2), and the pathological case was not handled at all.
4) Using this approach for reads and that of 3) for writes was slightly
faster with big amounts of data, but scaled slightly worse, and the
diverging implementations were deemed not desirable.
Fixes: QTBUG-64443
Change-Id: I1cd87c07db39f3b46a2683ce236d7eb67b5be549
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Jari Helaakoski
Friedemann Kleint
Lucie Gérard
Alex Trotsenko
Kai Koehne
Leander Beernaert