Spaceship operator was disabled for QCborValue, but not the test.
Change-Id: Icb91da689f62ef6de9f4fa926346505c5e50e9eb
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Use a template on the size of the char[], as suggested by Ville
Voutilainen. This resolves ambiguity about whether such look-ups
should be done via QString or QCborValue (not that it would have made
any difference).
When we come to add mutating indexing of QCborValue, chained
dereferences like map[i][j][k] need to stay in operator[] const
throughout, to avoid detaching intermediates to create references into
them due to using the mutating operator[] on the earlier dereference's
return. So const-qualify the QCborValue operator[] const variants at
the same time, to match those of QCborValue itself.
Change-Id: Ib1652ae9440fe3767a653afa2856b74040210e07
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
I'm intentionally not testing improperly-paired surrogates, since those
can't be encoded in CBOR.
Change-Id: I0d3cc366baaa49f3ad28fffd154240287ce34c22
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
If we ever need to add QCborValue to the bootstrap library, it's
unlikely that we'll need this part. And by splitting it, I can make the
code handle more cases, that hadn't been properly handled before.
Change-Id: I2f630efbbce54f14bfa9fffd154160c0ad893695
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
This makes QCborValue more future compatible, as code written today for
tags that QCborValue does not recognize will continue to work if
QCborValue gains support for it in the future.
This change also obviates the need for reinterpretAsTag(), which I had
not written unit tests for as I knew this change was coming.
Change-Id: I052407b777ec43f78378fffd15302bdc34f66755
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Questions:
1) should QCborMap::extract return value_type (a pair) instead of just
the value?
2) should the both return the iterator to the next element too, like
erase()?
Change-Id: I052407b777ec43f78378fffd15302a9c14468db3
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This is very similar to QJsonDocument, but there's no QCborDocument.
QCborValue is that.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added QCborValue, QCborArray and QCborMap, classes
that permit DOM-like access to CBOR data. The API is similar to
QJsonValue, QJsonArray and QJsonObject, respectively.
Change-Id: I9741f017961b410c910dfffd14ffca50dd8ef3ba
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Jüri Valdmann
Edward Welbourne
Thiago Macieira