Replace public operators operator==() and operator!=() of QCborValue
to friend method comparesEqual().
Replace public operator<() of QCborValue to friend method
compareThreeWay().
Use QT_CORE_REMOVED_SINCE to get rid of current comparison methods
and replace them with a friend.
Delete #if 0 && __has_include(<compare>) blocks,
since they are not required anymore.
Task-number: QTBUG-120300
Change-Id: I884ff6ce2a71618b0e3eaa907f0852f93c2a073c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
QOperatingSystemVersion intentionally does not define operator==() and
operator!=() since ae072cd9c4.
It means that we cannot use comparison helper macros.
Still, we can manually define four relational operators or
operator<=>() in C++20 mode, and give the class a partial ordering.
We choose partial ordering, because versions of different OS types are
incomparable.
Implement the operators in terms of helper function compareThreeWay(),
which potentially allows to use this class in some templated code.
As a drive-by: make the static compare() function noexcept, because
it really is.
Fixes: QTBUG-120360
Change-Id: Id4c9ce740e42baa719ca0ee84146d087b21675c6
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
QTypeRevision consists of two quint8 values: major and minor version.
Each of the versions can be unknown.
The rules for comparing with the unknown version are as follows:
zero version < unknown version < non-zero version
At the same time, two unknown versions are considered equal.
This makes the comparison a bit tricky, but it still fits into the
category of strong ordering.
Replace the existing friend relational operators with helper functions
and comparison helper macros, making this type strongly ordered.
Update the unit-tests to use the new comparison helper test functions.
As the test functions check the reversed arguments as well, we can
reduce the number of rows for the data-driven comparison test.
Fixes: QTBUG-120359
Change-Id: Ib6f1037fc7b5fed148e35ee48b56b05dcd36b3b4
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This patch simplifies the checks when migrating the class to comparison
helper macros.
Task-number: QTBUG-120359
Change-Id: I47a6ba20d3b89c31edc2f432621eae9385fbd0a3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Commit 90bc0ad41f ("QProcess/Unix: add
failChildProcessModifier()") added this line that set childStartedPipe
so that the failChildProcess() callback had something to write to. But
we left it set on exit from QProcessPrivate::startDetached(), which
caused the QProcess destructor to try and close it.
Noticed when debugging the issue for QTBUG-123083.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.7.0
Task-number: QTBUG-123083
Change-Id: I6818d78a57394e37857bfffd17bbc41c8400270f
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
It's the same aeshash() as before, except we're passing a template
parameter to indicate whether to read half and then zero-extend the
data. That is, it will perform a conversion from Latin1 on the fly.
When running in zero-extending mode, the length parameters are actually
doubled (counting the number of UTF-16 code units) and we then divide
again by 2 when advancing.
The implementation should have the following performance
characteristics:
* QLatin1StringView now will be roughly half as fast as Qt 6.7
* QLatin1StringView now will be roughly as fast as QStringView
For the aeshash128() in default builds of QtCore (will use SSE4.1), the
long loop (32 characters or more) is:
QStringView QLatin1StringView
movdqu -0x20(%rax),%xmm4 | pmovzxbw -0x10(%rdx),%xmm2
movdqu -0x10(%rax),%xmm5 | pmovzxbw -0x8(%rdx),%xmm3
add $0x20,%rax | add $0x10,%rdx
pxor %xmm4,%xmm0 | pxor %xmm2,%xmm0
pxor %xmm5,%xmm1 | pxor %xmm3,%xmm1
aesenc %xmm0,%xmm0 aesenc %xmm0,%xmm0
aesenc %xmm1,%xmm1 aesenc %xmm1,%xmm1
aesenc %xmm0,%xmm0 aesenc %xmm0,%xmm0
aesenc %xmm1,%xmm1 aesenc %xmm1,%xmm1
The number of instructions is identical, but there are actually 2 more
uops per iteration. LLVM-MCA simulation shows this should execute in the
same number of cycles on older CPUs that do not have support for VAES
(see <https://analysis.godbolt.org/z/x95Mrfrf7>).
For the VAES version in aeshash256() and the AVX10 version in
aeshash256_256():
QStringView QLatin1StringView
vpxor -0x40(%rax),%ymm1,%ym | vpmovzxbw -0x20(%rax),%ymm3
vpxor -0x20(%rax),%ymm0,%ym | vpmovzxbw -0x10(%rax),%ymm2
add $0x40,%rax | add $0x20,%rax
| vpxor %ymm3,%ymm0,%ymm0
| vpxor %ymm2,%ymm1,%ymm1
vaesenc %ymm1,%ymm1,%ymm1 <
vaesenc %ymm0,%ymm0,%ymm0 vaesenc %ymm0,%ymm0,%ymm0
vaesenc %ymm1,%ymm1,%ymm1 vaesenc %ymm1,%ymm1,%ymm1
vaesenc %ymm0,%ymm0,%ymm0 vaesenc %ymm0,%ymm0,%ymm0
> vaesenc %ymm1,%ymm1,%ymm1
In this case, the increase in number of instructions matches the
increase in number of uops. The LLVM-MCA simulation says that the
QLatin1StringView version is faster at 11 cycles/iteration vs 14 cyc/it
(see <https://analysis.godbolt.org/z/1Gv1coz13>), but that can't be
right.
Measured performance of CPU cycles, on an Intel Core i9-7940X (Skylake,
no VAES support), normalized on the QString performance (QByteArray is
used as a stand-in for the performance in Qt 6.7):
aeshash | siphash
QByteArray QL1SV QString QByteArray QString
dictionary 94.5% 79.7% 100.0% 150.5%* 159.8%
paths-small 90.2% 93.2% 100.0% 202.8% 290.3%
uuids 81.8% 100.7% 100.0% 215.2% 350.7%
longstrings 42.5% 100.8% 100.0% 185.7% 353.2%
numbers 95.5% 77.9% 100.0% 155.3%* 164.5%
On an Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Tiger Lake, capable of VAES and AVX512VL):
aeshash | siphash
QByteArray QL1SV QString QByteArray QString
dictionary 90.0% 91.1% 100.0% 103.3%* 157.1%
paths-small 99.4% 104.8% 100.0% 237.5% 358.0%
uuids 88.5% 117.6% 100.0% 274.5% 461.7%
longstrings 57.4% 111.2% 100.0% 503.0% 974.3%
numbers 90.6% 89.7% 100.0% 98.7%* 149.9%
On an Intel 4th Generation Xeon Scalable Platinum (Sapphire Rapids, same
Golden Cove core as Alder Lake):
aeshash | siphash
QByteArray QL1SV QString QByteArray QString
dictionary 89.9% 102.1% 100.0% 158.1%* 172.7%
paths-small 78.0% 89.4% 100.0% 159.4% 258.0%
uuids 109.1% 107.9% 100.0% 279.0% 496.3%
longstrings 52.1% 112.4% 100.0% 564.4% 1078.3%
numbers 85.8% 98.9% 100.0% 152.6%* 190.4%
* dictionary contains very short entries (6 characters)
* paths-small contains strings of varying length, but very few over 32
* uuids-list contains fixed-length strings (38 characters)
* longstrings is the same but 304 characters
* numbers also a lot contains very short strings (1 to 6 chars)
What this shows:
* For short strings, the performance difference is negligible between
all three
* For longer strings, QLatin1StringView now costs between 7 and 17% more
than QString on the tested machines instead of up to ~50% less, except on
the older machine (where I think the main QString hashing is suffering
from memory bandwidth limitations)
* The AES hash implementation is anywhere from 1.6 to 11x faster than
Siphash
* Murmurhash (marked with asterisk) is much faster than Siphash, but it
only managed to beat the AES hash in one test
Change-Id: I664b9f014ffc48cbb49bfffd17b045c1811ac0ed
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
So that it hashes to the same value as QString{,View}.
In order to test this, you must either run on a CPU other than ARM and
x86, or disable the AES hasher. I did that and can confirm siphash and
murmurhash do work with on-the-fly conversion from Latin-1.
Change-Id: I664b9f014ffc48cbb49bfffd17b03e5e62ec4e89
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This complements the previous commit by adding the heterogeneous lookup
in operator[]. Unlike the members of the previous commit, this one may
insert into the hash, in which case it needs a way to cast from the
heterogeneous type K to the actual Key type.
Change-Id: I664b9f014ffc48cbb49bfffd17b037c1063dfb91
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This implements support in QHash and QMultiHash for lookups of
heterogeneous key types that produce the same hash value. This is
implemented by duplicating each of the following functions into an
overload on Key and one a template that is enable_if-constrained to a
key type that meets the requirement:
* contains
* count
* equals_range
* find
* operator[] (const only)
* remove
* take
* value
* values (QMultiHash)
The non-const operator[] may insert into the hash, so it's not part of
this commit.
Change-Id: I664b9f014ffc48cbb49bfffd17b037852f0fd192
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This merges the tempFile and caching tests, which had been updated in
commit ae03ffaffd to attempt other
filesystems than APFS and btrfs.
Instead of adding yet another item to the list (xfs), let's insist by
writing more and flushing the OS buffers. Local testing says that btrfs
usually updates after the first write(), no later than the second, and
that APFS and XFS "just works" now (without the fsync() even).
Pick-to: 6.7
Fixes: QTBUG-123151
Change-Id: I6818d78a57394e37857bfffd17bbe7427307efc4
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Samir <a.samirh78@gmail.com>
By using "wt" for all OS's; according to Thiago the 't' is ignored
everywhere except on Windows.
tests/auto/corelib/io/qfile/tst_qfile.cpp:2846:70: warning: comparison
between ‘enum QOperatingSystemVersionBase::OSType’ and ‘enum
QOperatingSystemVersion::OSType’ [-Wenum-compare]
2846 | const char *openMode = QOperatingSystemVersion::current().type() != QOperatingSystemVersion::Windows
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amends 3446313c7a
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: I310d7d6ce3833756ffdc47b000e052ef3afdfdef
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The relational operators were removed in
8652c79df0 with the argument that they
do not have a total order. Back than it was a valid argument, because Qt
did not support any of the C++20 ordering types.
Now Qt has its own implementation for all three ordering types, so we
could technically add relational operators and claim that QVariant
provides partial ordering.
However, that could potentially lead to many bugs and/or unexpected
results, if people start using QVariant as a key in std::map/QMap
containers.
We do not want that to happen, so we only use the helper macros to
implement (in)equality operators.
This commit also extends the unit tests, providing more extensive
testing of (in)equality operators and the pre-existing
QVariant::compare() method.
Fixes: QTBUG-113234
Change-Id: I783f3b5df552da782627f4ed0a5bb1b577753a23
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
I don't know what it is but it's not 1, because it is quite
often flaky in these tests. A single failure leads to deadlock
that takes 5 minutes to fail. Then a rerun might do another
5 minutes and fail the integration, or it will pass but take
longer to do so.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I188276df7800b00a20dbe39edee91c582f0a82a7
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
For some reason android in CI failed to include the
moc file through the mocs_compilation file.
It's an issue that needs some investigation, but
in the interest of time just include the moc file
directly.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I079588598a6f4137ef1fccc482795d703b59bc6e
Reviewed-by: Alexey Edelev <alexey.edelev@qt.io>
Amends 8af346c1f6 and
1d9137e13f.
Found in 6.7 API review
Task-number: QTBUG-123115
Pick-to: 6.7 6.7.0
Change-Id: I98d79274f26f3439302a59181401b6e244fe5202
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The variadic templates are supposed to be removed from the
overload set when any of the parameters is a literal string type,
as otherwise we get conflicts with the legacy overload taking
class names and signatures as const char *. The detection of
a literal string types was missing a few specializations, so that
we ended up with the wrong overload being called, and class
names getting interpreted as method names instead.
Add the missing specializations, and add more test coverage
for using the old overloads.
Task-number: QTBUG-122235
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I5488f2009c8f62d74fac6754844f57cf64011414
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Rami Potinkara <rami.potinkara@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lauri Pohjanheimo <lauri.pohjanheimo@qt.io>
The class had operator==(), operator!=() and operator <() defined as
public member functions, so use QT_CORE_REMOVED_SINCE and
removed_api.cpp to get rid of these methods and replace them with hidden
friends.
Use QT_TEST_ALL_EQUALITY_OPS macro in unit-tests.
Use new \compares command in the documentation to describe the
comparison operators provided by QUrl.
Task-number: QTBUG-120303
Change-Id: Ic4fa2335292cc4b75ad2373832c0b89d768f529c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
P2447 has been merged in C++26, backport the same functionality.
This makes QSpan<const T> a proper replacement for a const QList<T>&
parameter, because now both can be built via a braced-init-list.
// void f(const QList<int> &l); // old
void f(QSpan<const int>); // new
f({1, 2, 3}); // now OK
This is, technically speaking, SiC: in the presence of both `f`
overloads, the code above would have called the QList one. Now instead
the call is ambiguous.
We've been there already -- this is QString and QStringView all over
again, and the solution is the same: get rid of the owning container
overload. I'd rather have this construction *sooner* rather than *later*
in order to minimize the fallout.
And just like QString vs QStringView, there's nothing really doable to
prevent instant-dangling situations:
QStringView v = getString(); // dangles
QSpan<const int> s = {1, 2, 3}; // ditto
except for using QSpan (QStringView) as a *parameter type only*.
Note that QSpan with dynamic extent was already convertible from
std::initializer_list through its ranged constructor. However this fact
alone doesn't unlock the above syntax. QSpan with a static extent was
also convertible for the same reason. (This is non-standard:
std::span's range constructor for static extents is explicit, but QSpan
doesn't follow that design choice and makes the constructors implicit
instead.)
Found in API-review.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I160ab5b292b0c2568cd9a7ad1b4430085f475c29
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
According to QUIP-18 [1], all tests file should be
LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GPL-3.0-only
[1]: https://contribute.qt-project.org/quips/18
Task-number: QTBUG-121787
Change-Id: Iee9f4fca676e77ab9d8ed485a28ce5ea8803be15
Reviewed-by: Kai Köhne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
According to QUIP-18 [1], all tools file should be
LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0
[1]: https://contribute.qt-project.org/quips/18
Pick-to: 6.7
Task-number: QTBUG-121787
Change-Id: Icd5d5be2e04819617e68ff142924de1773bebbad
Reviewed-by: Kai Köhne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
Which will be used to represent timer IDs. Thanks to Marc for the idea
to use "a strongly typed int".
QTimer got a new id() method that returns Qt::TimerId (can't overload
timerId()). Various classes in qtbase have a member named timerId(), but
a new method is needed anyway in QTimer so id() it is (this is the
reason QChronoTimer only has id() and no timerId()). Besides
timer.timerId() has an extra "timer".
This commit fixes the inconsistency between QObject using `0` timer id
to indicate "failed to start", while QTimer::timerId() returned `-1` to
indicate "timer is inactive". QTimer::id(), being a new method and all,
now returns Qt::TimerId::Invalid, which has value `0`, so that the
values match between the two classes. Extend the unittests to ensure
QTimer::timerId()'s behavior is preserved.
[ChangeLog][Core][QObject] Added Qt::TimerId enum class, that is used to
represent timer IDs.
Change-Id: I0e8564c1461884106d8a797cc980a669035d480a
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The interval in QTimer is a QProperty of type int, which means it's
limited to the number of milliseconds that would fit in an int (~24
days), this could cause overflow if a user constructs a QTimer with an
interval > INT_MAX milliseconds. And it can't be easily changed to use
qint64/std::chrono::nanoseconds:
- changing the getters to return qint64 means user code would have
narrowing conversions
- the bindable QProperty interval can't be changed to qint64 during
Qt6's lifetime without the risk of breaking user code
- adding a new bindable QProperty that is qint64/nanoseconds is an
option, but it has the complication of what to do with the int
interval; set it when setInterval(milliseconds) is used by using
saturation arithmetic? and what about notifying observers of the
changed interval?
Thus the idea of creating a new stop-gap class, QChronoTimer, as a
cleaner solution. Both classes use QTimerPrivate.
During the lifetime of Qt6, QTimer's interval range is about 24 days,
whereas QChronoTimer's interval range is about 292 years
(duration_cast<years>nanoseconds::max()).
Currently the plan is to fold QChronotTimer back into QTimer in Qt7.
Mark all QPropertyS in the new class as FINAL since they aren't
intended to be overridden; this offers a performance boost for QML[1].
[1] https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2024-February/044977.html
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added QChronoTimer, which uses a
std::chrono::nanoseconds intervals, as a replacement for QTimer.
Fixes: QTBUG-113544
Change-Id: I71697f4a8b35452c6b5604b1322ee7f0b4453f04
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Ultimately this is the best way to keep the log history of the code.
Change-Id: I3413deffdb093a3239d65b6ca939e744224e722a
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Then we will automatically handle invalid leading characters instead
of throwing away the whole sequence when it cannot be converted.
Added a test that was failing before.
Drive-by change: add a comment explaining why we
have the stack allocated buffer.
Task-number: QTBUG-118834
Change-Id: I647a58f2ba95e2e7ed4ea6a964d99ecc0c91fad3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Some machine in CI is failing some of these sometimes and
I would like to know by how much.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I88b41d5cde81419f7c11f7038101962630eb31ef
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Also extend unit-test to use new test helper functions.
Remove the now-redundant test for three-way comparison, because it is
covered by the test helper functions.
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: I242b560c281245e04e34353c80000a20998fc677
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Replace the existing friend relational operators with the macros.
Add the previously-missing relational opertors with QChar and char16_t.
This allows to remove the last dummy relational operators and the
macros to generate them in tst_qstringapisymmetry.
Because of a bug in libstdc++[0], we have to explicitly keep the
QBA vs QBA relational operators even in C++20 mode. This problem is
specific to QByteArray, because it is convertible to const void *.
[0]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114153
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: Iac7f81cd3274331b7c7695a51803321b511361c0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Replace the existing friend relational operators with the macros.
Add the previously-missing QChar vs `const char *` relational operators.
These require out-of-line helper methods, because we need to interpret
the `const char *` array as utf-8.
The `const char *` relational operators cause ambiguities when
comparing QChar with 0 (previously it was only handled by the nullptr_t
overloads). As we have it in several places in our tests, I'd assume
that the users can also do it. To resolve the ambiguities, mark the
new relational operators as Q_WEAK_OVERLOADs.
This allows to remove the dummy QChar vs `const char *` relational
operators from tst_qstringapisymmetry, but at the same time requires
that we introduce new dummy operators for QByteArray vs char16_t
comparison. These will be fixed in a follow-up patch.
For QLatin1Char - convert to uchar before doing the comparison, to
match the behavior of QLatin1StringView and QChar. Extend QChar's
unit tests.
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: I9213fe05a5efdb96d48688f07bec9519f9887a77
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This allows to remove the dummy relational operators from
tst_qstringapisymmetry.
Task-number: QTBUG-108805
Change-Id: I7cb3154d6fcb571cafab6b318806f74bc8300448
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Add QU8SV vs QSV, QU8SV vs QChar, and QU8SV vs char16_t relational
operators.
This allows to get rid of the dummy relational operators in
tst_qstringapisymmetry.
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: If95d7418efd13c505ed0e3bef748b86ff55e623a
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The comparison with QStringView works as is, there is no need to add
explicit operators.
Add the missing relational operators with QUtf8StringView. Once it
is added, comparison of QString with u8"string literal" becomes
ambiguous, so explicitly add operators for `const char8_t*` as well.
This also makes the comparison with u8 string literals faster,
because it now uses a view instead of constructing a QString.
Adding QUtf8StringView overloads also makes comparison with
`const char *` ambiguous if QT_RESTRICTED_CAST_FROM_ASCII is defined.
To fix that, mark the overload as Q_WEAK_OVERLOAD. Luckily, we can
just use the third Attributes parameter of the macro for that.
Provide more unit-tests to cover the new relational operators.
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: I60d1f4ad7ea607472deeb5c250e62f2bb7019268
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Use the comparison helper macros to replace the member relational
operators for comparison with QByteArray and const char *.
As QString and QByteArray are exported, we cannot simply remove the
inline methods, so wrap them into QT_CORE_REMOVED_SINCE.
Add relational operators with QByteArrayView.
Provide more unit-tests for the comparison with the byte array types.
This enables operator<=> for QString vs byte arrays in C++20 builds.
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: I305343e1b6c5d78b10f2976573db4e904ba6b44b
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Replace the hidden friend relational operators with hidden friend
helper functions and comparison helper macros.
Provide more unit-tests for the updated types.
This enables operator<=> in C++20 builds.
Task-number: QTBUG-117661
Change-Id: I17329cd6422f272a435fc1da241203581eef7fbb
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Even though undocumented, it's public API, doesn't hurt to carry
along, and improves compiler coverage in the test, so let's not remove
it.
Found in 6.7 API review
Amends 95e6fac0a5.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Ia935036a69e0e678f22ac86b48a2c1c5e8c46733
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Both QByteArrayView and std::string_view are Literal Types, so the
conversion between them should be constexpr.
Amends 96d67da420.
Found in API-review.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Ic513ce32aa2a743ca890dc05a683a62c0f3a7d50
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juha Vuolle <juha.vuolle@qt.io>
This class offers a forward-only const_iterator, that matches the system
low-level functions' logic (e.g. readdir()/dirstream logic). This
iterator is a std::input_iterator_tag.
QDirIterator uses Java-style iterators that have a couple of issues:
- They don't fit the logic of the underlying native system functions
(readdir()/__dirstream and co.), there is no way to know if there is a
next entry except by advancing the iterator (calling readdir()) first
- As a consequence of the above, two QFileInfo objects, current and next,
had to be used to fit that paradigm; and the code always
iterated/stat'ed an extra entry past the one we want, e.g. when
filtering
The next step is porting QAbstractFileEngineIterator and its subclasses
to be like QFileSystemIterator, i.e. replace hasNext()/next() with a `bool
advance()` virtual method. This is easier to reason about than the
Java-style iterators, and is more in-line with the new class.
Discussed-on: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2023-December/044745.html
Change-Id: I8e696cefdca18d8c78f803efdb83a73dd43eb720
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
To make it easier to follow the history in git.
Change-Id: I094056c1ec130aeef77aa2d20289ab766bc25083
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Rename the toType() overloads taking an out-parameter to appendToType(),
because that gives a better understanding of the usecase.
Found in 6.7 API review
Amends 8af346c1f6 and
1d9137e13f.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Ic1a462e9507123a59e6086bfb48b8b61ab79abb8
Reviewed-by: Juha Vuolle <juha.vuolle@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QString/QByteArray] Added slice() methods that work
like sliced(), but modify the string/byte-array they are called on.
Task-number: QTBUG-99218
Change-Id: I3075562983ef123d9aa022a2304c7e774cf2ea42
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Changed type of `id`, `int` -> `size_t`, to match `liveCount`, in
`CountedObject` struct.
Fixes: QTBUG-122301
Change-Id: I85513d5ff6a4f0c3fb53f77e55c43b1284d1b1a8
Reviewed-by: Matthias Rauter <matthias.rauter@qt.io>
Change type of variables `int` -> `size_t`, to match assigned value.
Fixes: QTBUG-122300
Change-Id: I5b99bd6a3b307ba2ec4ef79bcc517da60ae36413
Reviewed-by: Matthias Rauter <matthias.rauter@qt.io>
One more method for STL compatibility.
This one is particularly subtle as it's required by the
`reservable-container` concept:
https://eel.is/c++draft/ranges#range.utility.conv.general-3
Without this concept, ranges::to won't reserve() before copying the
elements (out of a sized range which isn't a common_range).
Implementation notes: there were already a couple of constants denoting
the maximum QByteArray and QString size. Centralize that implementation
in QTypedArrayData, so that QList can use it too.
The maximum allocation size (private constant) needs a even more central
place so that even QVLA can use it. Lacking anything better, I've put it
in qcontainerfwd.h.
Since our containers aren't allocator-aware, I can make max_size() a
static member, and replace the existing constants throughout the rest of
qtbase. (I can't kill them yet as they're used by other submodules.)
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QList] Added max_size().
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QString] Added max_size().
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArray] Added max_size().
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QVarLengthArray] Added max_size().
Change-Id: I176142e31b998f4f787c96333894b8f6653eb70d
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
As the comment says, on most RISC platforms, the return address need not
be on the stack in the first place. In fact, in all ones currently
supported by Qt, it's passed in a register to the callee, which has the
option of simply saving it in a callee-save register when calling leaf
functions. Even if it is using a frame pointer, the compiler can simply
use any register. That means unwinding the stack is not possible in the
absence of either debug information or stack-unwind information, neither
of which backtrace(3) will use.
Strictly speaking, even on x86 the compiler can use the RBP register for
any purpose and thus make getting the backtrace() impossible, but in
practice it seems to work.
Fixes: QTBUG-121389
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I5dd50a1a7ca5424d9e7afffd17acbd01ef916f5d
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Add implict constructor, treat the list like any other container.
Simplify the test code, and explicitly constructor-initialize when
we want an array and might have an array, so that we don't end up
with constructing arrays of arrays.
Change-Id: I14615f897cf8a2188510cfe1085ffc70a2396d5d
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
QUrlQuery had operator==() and operator!=() defined as public member
functions, so use QT_CORE_REMOVED_SINCE and removed_api.cpp to get
rid of these methods and replace them with a hidden friend.
Use QT_TEST_ALL_EQUALITY_OPS macro in unit-tests.
Use new \compares command in the documentation to describe the
comparison operators provided by QUrlQuery.
Task-number: QTBUG-120303
Change-Id: I083487a134887010ebbb78906d2c1982f2ad41b5
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Since we support QString and QList specializations, we should also
support QStringList directly. That's a bit more involved as we need
to specialize the code path for QString, which is not convertible to
or from jobject. But once we have mapped the type to jstring it
follows the implementation for lists of objects.
We now need to generate temporary local references when
converting a QString to a jstring, so manage a local frame. We do
so explicitly in chunks of 100 local references.
Change-Id: I7ae5cf7d0ba0099992c36f3677980c346526804b
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
This didn't work yet because the partial specialization of the
JNITypeForArgImpl factory was missing. Add a test case for
QJniArray<double> and QList<double>.
What doesn't work (yet) is QStringList for a native Java function
taking a String[]. That will be added in a follow-up commit.
Change-Id: I4d3fa0ecc04b98b9749f8358792f86c02ddbbc14
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Alexandru Croitor
Tatiana Borisova
Ivan Solovev
Thiago Macieira
Ahmad Samir
Mårten Nordheim
Volker Hilsheimer
Rym Bouabid
Giuseppe D'Angelo
Lucie Gérard
Marc Mutz
Isak Fyksen