When setFuture() was handed an element of m_futures, it would hold the
reference to past the clear(), which invalidates said reference.
Fix by taking the future by value instead of by cref.
While append() is not affected, as QList::append() already guards
against aliasing, do the same change there, both for consistency as
well as to optimize the common case of passing rvalues. It also means
we can use the rvalue overload of QList::append(), skipping the alias
analysis in the lvalue QList::append().
[ChangeLog][QtConcurrent][QFutureSynchronizer] Fixed a crash in
setFuture() if the argument was already a member of
QFutureSynchronizer::futures().
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: Ic0b212b9f265a746df9a6beb6272a5415d131442
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Previously, failure handlers did not propagate cancellation. This would
lead to crashes when a QPromise was cancelled without having generated
any result. Subsequent continuations would be invoked and try to access
the result (which was nonexistent) and then crash.
This patch propagates cancellation through failure handlers to prevent
subsequent continuations from being called in the first place.
Fixes: QTBUG-114606
Pick-to: 6.6
Pick-to: 6.5
Change-Id: I23b28a8e70a76e1ba6416be4440360c6dbaef2a3
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Like commit 91f6460aff which added support
for Windows. This API is documented and has apparently been present in
FreeBSD for a long while.
The DragonflyBSD API is very similar, but I don't have one to confirm
that I've coded correctly. OpenBSD and NetBSD may have similar APIs, but
I haven't even researched them. We're open to contributions, though.
Change-Id: I63b988479db546dabffcfffd1766bc431fed614b
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
When using move-only types, continuations args are set using takeResult
function, which has the side effect of invalidating the QFutureInterface
associated with the promise/futures by:
1. setting isValid to false
2. setting the state to NoState
And when the promise is destroyed, it tries to run the continuations if
`finished()` is not called, which is done by checking the Finished bit
in the state. But since the continuation has been run before, and the
state has been set to NoState it tries to run the continuation again
causing a segfault. Multiple solutions come in mind:
1. don't run the continuation if the state is NoState, but this would
break the case when an empty promise is destroyed
2. check inside the continuation if it has been run before, and if so
don't run it again, but this seems hacky since we don't want the
continuation to be run twice, and it should break if it did.
3. when invalidating the promise leave the state as is, and change
isValid only to false, which changes the current behavior, but is
still compatible with the documentation which states only that
isValid will return false if takeResult is called
I chose option 3
I also extended some tests to test for move only types, and added a test
that continuations run when a promise is finished. This simple case
would segfault before with move only types.
Fixes: QTBUG-112513
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6
Change-Id: Ie225ac4fdf618e4edfb0efd663d6c7fd6b916dbd
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
This patch relaxes the requirements on the context object of
continuations. Instead of having to stay alive during execution of the
whole chain, it now only has to stay alive during setup of the chain.
If the context object is destroyed before the chain finishes, the
respective future is canceled.
This patch works by using QFutureCallOutInterface and signals instead
of direct invocation of the continuation by the parent future, similar
to how QFutureWatcher is implemented.
If a continuation is used with a context object, a QBasicFutureWatcher
is connected to the QFuture via a QFutureCallOutInterface. When the
future finishes, QBasicFutureWatcher::finished() triggers the
continuation with a signal/slot connection.
This way, we require the context object to stay alive only during setup;
the required synchronization is guaranteed by the existing event and
signal-slot mechanisms. The continuation itself does not need to know
about the context object anymore.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QFuture] Added support for context objects of
continuations being destroyed before the continuation finishes. In
these cases the future is cancelled immediately.
Fixes: QTBUG-112958
Change-Id: Ie0ef3470b2a0ccfa789d2ae7604b92e509c14591
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Create tests to check that the continuations attached to ready futures
are immediately executed, and that the proper handlers are selected.
These checks were missing from the overall test set, which was detected
while working on the linked issue.
Task-number: QTBUG-112958
Change-Id: Iae97e4b9dfb1e016869693a5162f72e027ca7f5e
Reviewed-by: Arno Rehn <a.rehn@menlosystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This removes the last use of QtPrivate::convertToMilliseconds().
Change-Id: I6f518d59e63249ddbf43fffd1759fee2e00d36f4
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Samir <a.samirh78@gmail.com>
We never copy the function so only need it to movable. Moves the
functions to templates using the new QRunnable create version.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThreadPool] Methods taking callable functions,
can now take move-only lambdas.
Fixes: QTBUG-112302
Change-Id: I2cb200f0abcf7e0fdbef0457fe2a6176764ad93d
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
It's unlikely we will ever use pro2cmake at this project stage,
so it doesn't make any sense to keep the 'special case' markers
in the CMake scripts. Remove them and replace with TODO where
needed.
Change-Id: I84290c20679dabbfdec3c5937ce0428fecb3e5a7
Reviewed-by: Amir Masoud Abdol <amir.abdol@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
And implement the rvalue overload of addResult() using it.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QPromise] Added emplaceResult() and
emplaceResultAt() member functions.
Fixes: QTBUG-112270
Change-Id: Id369542215a60c0818f1afa8d564498be84732e8
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][Deprecation Notice][QtCore] The QtFuture::makeReadyFuture()
method and all its specializations are deprecated since Qt 6.10.
The reason for the deprecation is that the method has a
makeReadyFuture(const QList<T> &) overload, which behaves differently
from all other overloads (including other non-const ref QList
overloads).
Use QtFuture::makeReadyVoidFuture() when you need a ready void QFuture,
or QtFuture::makeReadyValueFuture() when you need to propagate the
input type to the returned QFuture, or QtFuture::makeReadyRangeFuture()
when you need to create a multi-value future based on an input
container.
Fixes: QTBUG-109677
Change-Id: I55125269989df0a02840d5ddd5763ef5f1070df5
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QFuture] Added QtFuture::makeReadyVoidFuture()
and QtFuture::makeReadyValueFuture().
Basically, these methods behave like QtFuture::makeReadyFuture(), but
QtFuture::makeReadyValueFuture() does not have a "const QList<T> &"
specialization returning QFuture<T> instead of QFuture<QList<T>>,
which allows it to always behave consistently.
This patch also introduces usage of the new methods around qtbase.
Task-number: QTBUG-109677
Change-Id: I89df8b26d82c192baad69efb5df517a8b182995f
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QFuture] Introduce
QtFuture::makeReadyRangeFuture(). This method takes a container
which has input iterators and returns a multi-value
QFuture<ValueType>, where ValueType is the underlying type of
the input container.
This commit also replaces the usage of buggy
QtFuture::makeReadyFuture(const QList<T> &) overload with the new
method.
Task-number: QTBUG-109677
Change-Id: I019e62eac74c643d88a65b3cc0085bc7c33bc712
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
The overhead of making new custom classes appears to be less than
constructing a generic std::function.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QRunnable] QRunnable::create can now take
non-copyable functions as argument.
Task-number: QTBUG-112302
Change-Id: Ied870f13ca6c7eaa14ed6eff9c4e676c7b73881c
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
... by supplying a TestThreadPool that waitsForDone() with a defined
timeout in the dtor.
When tests hang, this will now print an intelligible message instead
of just the generic watchdog-killed-process one.
Also replace all QVERIFY(waitForDone()) with the same code used in
TestThreadPool's dtor and add a comment in a place we'd rather not use
these tools.
Pick-to: 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: Ifd2b3372eb7c7337a3ba77d003e45dcd77e23545
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The usual problem, the usual fix: default the addResult() template
argument to the class template argument, cf. e.g. wg21.link/p2218.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QPromise] Added support for calls to addResult()
with braced initializers.
Fixes: QTBUG-111826
Change-Id: I9ad7294dbcefbc5d2609ca3d9e7304dbeb8b3f41
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
... and also extend the documentation to explain this case explicitly.
Fixes: QTBUG-107545
Pick-to: 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: I9414cc677b037989de60e97871485018e5c8a569
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
I got tired of being told off by the inanity 'bot for faithfully
reflecting existing #if-ery in new #if-ery. Retain only the
documentation and definition of the deprecated define.
Change-Id: I47f47b76bd239a360f27ae5afe593dfad8746538
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Samir <a.samirh78@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
All the other overloads are implemented using the new one.
Windows change relies on the pre-check in the code review making sure it
compiles.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThread] Added sleep(std::chrono::nanoseconds)
overload.
Task-number: QTBUG-110059
Change-Id: I9a4f4bf09041788ec9275093b6b8d0386521e286
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
C++20 doesn't like arithmetic with enums anymore. While this hasn't
caused immediate pain, yet, fix it pro-actively for an imminent patch.
As a drive-by, fix the missing space at start of comment.
Pick-to: 6.5 6.4 6.4.3 6.2
Change-Id: Id08bb227c587bc7b900c593a7b6d2655ca32eefd
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Not clearing the continuationData could lead to use-after-free when
there is an attempt to cancel an already finished future, which belongs
to an already-destroyed promise.
This patch fixes it be explicitly resetting continuationData to nullptr
in the clearContinuation() method, which is called from the QPromise
destructor.
Task-number: QTBUG-103514
Pick-to: 6.5 6.4 6.2
Change-Id: I6418b3f5ad04f2fdc13a196ae208009eaa5de367
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The multi-thread snippet in the documentation, when copied as is,
could actually crash because of the race condition between the main
thread and the thread that generate results for the promise.
This is fixed by explicitly calling QPromise::start().
Actually, the underlying snippet already has this call, it just was
not included in the documentation.
This patch modifies the documentation snippet to include calls to
both QPromise::start() and QPromise::finish().
Fixes: QTBUG-109230
Pick-to: 6.5 6.4 6.2
Change-Id: Ic25f31a6b3b16ba6bc06a0b199289c8c5d50bab6
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <kurazyan.sona@gmail.com>
To support cancellation of continuations attached via the parent future,
we store a pointer to continuation future's data in parent. This
requires preserving the lifetime of continuation future's data while the
parent is still alive (see 24dedaeaa1).
This is achieved by capturing the promise in the continuation's lambda,
which is only cleaned up after the parent's data is destroyed. This is
already the case for continuations without context, but was overlooked
for continuations with context: they transfer the ownership of the
continuation promise to lambda passed to QMetaObject::invokeMethod(),
which destroys the lambda's context after it's run. As a result, the
continuation's promise (and data, if there are no other copies of it)
is also destroyed, leaving the parent pointing to deleted continuation
data.
To fix this, capture a copy of continuation future's ref-counted data in
the continuation's lambda. This will guarantee that the continuation
data remains alive until the parent is destroyed and the continuation
is cleaned up.
Fixes: QTBUG-108790
Pick-to: 6.5 6.4 6.2
Change-Id: Ief4b37f31e652988d13b03499505ac65c7889226
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Makes the pre-existing QFutureInterface functionality available via
the public QPromise API.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QPromise] Added addResults() to report multiple
results at once.
Change-Id: I18e6ef2781df422020b9022d78d6c45107b01668
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <kurazyan.sona@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
This is a semantic patch using ClangTidyTransformator as in
qtbase/df9d882d41b741fef7c5beeddb0abe9d904443d8, but extended to
handle typedefs and accesses through pointers, too:
const std::string o = "object";
auto hasTypeIgnoringPointer = [](auto type) { return anyOf(hasType(type), hasType(pointsTo(type))); };
auto derivedFromAnyOfClasses = [&](ArrayRef<StringRef> classes) {
auto exprOfDeclaredType = [&](auto decl) {
return expr(hasTypeIgnoringPointer(hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType(recordType(hasDeclaration(decl))))).bind(o);
};
return exprOfDeclaredType(cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom(hasAnyName(classes))));
};
auto renameMethod = [&] (ArrayRef<StringRef> classes,
StringRef from, StringRef to) {
return makeRule(cxxMemberCallExpr(on(derivedFromAnyOfClasses(classes)),
callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName(from), parameterCountIs(0)))),
changeTo(cat(access(o, cat(to)), "()")),
cat("use '", to, "' instead of '", from, "'"));
};
renameMethod(<classes>, "count", "size");
renameMethod(<classes>, "length", "size");
except that the on() matcher has been replaced by one that doesn't
ignoreParens().
a.k.a qt-port-to-std-compatible-api V5 with config Scope: 'Container'.
Added two NOLINTNEXTLINEs in tst_qbitarray and tst_qcontiguouscache,
to avoid porting calls that explicitly test count().
Change-Id: Icfb8808c2ff4a30187e9935a51cad26987451c22
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
We've been requiring C++17 since Qt 6.0, and our qAsConst use finally
starts to bother us (QTBUG-99313), so time to port away from it
now.
Since qAsConst has exactly the same semantics as std::as_const (down
to rvalue treatment, constexpr'ness and noexcept'ness), there's really
nothing more to it than a global search-and-replace, with manual
unstaging of the actual definition and documentation in dist/,
src/corelib/doc/ and src/corelib/global/.
Task-number: QTBUG-99313
Change-Id: I4c7114444a325ad4e62d0fcbfd347d2bbfb21541
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
To support cancellation of continuations attached via the parent future,
for each future returned by a continuation we store a pointer to its
parent (i.e. future the continuation is attached to). Later, before
executing a continuation, we go through chain of parents and check if
any of them is cancelled. However, if one of the parents is destroyed
while the chain is executing, the next continuations' parent pointers
will become invalid. So storing the parent pointers isn't safe.
This commit changes the logic of handling the cancelled continuation
chain in the following way:
- Instead of storing a parent pointer in the continuation future's data,
we do the opposite: we store a pointer to continuation's future in the
parent.
- When a future is cancelled, we mark all continuation futures in the
chain with a flag indicating that the chain is cancelled.
- To guarantee that the pointers to continuation future's data don't
become invalid, we clean the continuation (that stores a copy of its
future's data and keeps it alive) only when the associated promise
is destructed, instead of cleaning it after the continuation is run.
Fixes: QTBUG-105182
Fixes: QTBUG-106083
Pick-to: 6.2 6.3 6.4
Change-Id: I48afa98152672c0fc737112be4ca3b1b42f6ed30
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
__has_include(<chrono>) is always true, because C++11 chrono include
is required since 6.0.
Pick-to: 6.4 6.3 6.2
Change-Id: I50cb92571bf4f1f86e2f3f2b5f486dd3c3f30f4a
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
CMakeLists.txt and .cmake files of significant size
(more than 2 lines according to our check in tst_license.pl)
now have the copyright and license header.
Existing copyright statements remain intact
Task-number: QTBUG-88621
Change-Id: I3b98cdc55ead806ec81ce09af9271f9b95af97fa
Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Or the previous limit, 10.
The test has a flaky and failing history, esp on macOS. Trying to
provoke race conditions with more threads than we have cores has little
value.
Pick-to: 6.4
Change-Id: I99dd2b5a6f64faa83963c279c84fc547416f914f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Deal with the case that the object gets deleted between a call to
moveToThread and the start of the thread by removing the object from the
list in that case.
Fixes: QTBUG-104014
Pick-to: 6.4
Change-Id: Ib249b6e8e8dfbc4d1332bb99a57fa9d3cff16465
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
If we create a QThread from QThread::current(), we want it to have a
correct value for its bindingStatus. Thus, initialize bindingStatus in
the ctor of QAdoptedThread.
Task-number: QTBUG-101177
Task-number: QTBUG-102403
Pick-to: 6.4 6.3
Change-Id: I3ef27ed62c5dc25eed05d551c72743a1b8528318
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
It's always true these days, assert so in qatomic.cpp and
tst_QAtomicInteger.
Update the docs.
Pick-to: 6.4
Change-Id: I3684cff96c1d2e05677314e29514cc279bd6b1a1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
If the QFuture is canceled because the associated QPromise has been
destroyed, we still need to run its continuations (i.e. onCanceled
handler, if it's attached), so replaced the cleanContinuation() call
inside ~QPromise() with runContinuation(), which will also take care of
cleaning the continuation.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][Important Behavior Changes] QFuture now runs its
continuations when its associated QPromise has been destroyed.
Previously, if a QFuture was canceled because the associated QPromise
has been destroyed, its continuations were skipped.
Fixes: QTBUG-103992
Pick-to: 6.4 6.3 6.2
Change-Id: Ie05bc760c96c349aade8adb8d2fe5263aff8efac
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
We missed the terminating ";" in the QSKIP lines.
Amends ea4d6b987a
Pick-to: 6.3 6.4
Change-Id: Ibda43b8a84230c243dbcc74e157f4c3f8ef3891d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Thread termination might prevent stack unwinding, which then
generates ASAN errors such as
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-underflow on address
0x7f3c1d7858b0 at pc 0x7f3c243d8918 bp 0x7f3c1d7857f0 sp 0x7f3c1d7857e8
Skip such tests so that we can enable blocking CI runs under ASAN.
Fixes: QTBUG-104421
Pick-to: 6.4 6.3
Change-Id: I169235a12190e3f72525cddfe1a44a4bee19eca1
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
Found by codespell
Pick-to: 6.4
Change-Id: Ie3e301a23830c773a2e9aff487c702a223d246eb
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Bennett <nicholas.bennett@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
On finishing/terminating a thread, when processing posted events,
we need to consider QThread's own data instead of caller thread's data.
Otherwise we can get into unexpected situations such as double
destruction of an object, premature destruction, etc.
Fixes: QTBUG-103922
Pick-to: 6.4 6.3 6.3.1 6.2 5.15
Change-Id: Idf77221ebbaa0b150ee2d0c296b51829ae8dc30e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
... in favor of including qabstracteventdispatcher_p.h, where needed.
Keeps the code DRY.
Change-Id: I5bee2e653cb29ffac2601ff03c952a4b3adbdb9c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Add the Q_OS_WIN32 guard for the include of QWinEventNotifier.
Change-Id: I7824b2ee236a370c83fd85a2f594a39cf36b36e6
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Replace the current license disclaimer in files by
a SPDX-License-Identifier.
Files that have to be modified by hand are modified.
License files are organized under LICENSES directory.
Task-number: QTBUG-67283
Change-Id: Id880c92784c40f3bbde861c0d93f58151c18b9f1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Added QFuture::unwrap() for unwrapping the future nested inside
QFuture<QFuture<T>>. QTBUG-86725 suggests doing the unwrapping
automatically inside .then(), but this will change the return type
of .then() that used to return QFuture<QFuture<T>> and might cause
SC breaks. Apart from that, QFuture::unwrap() might be helpful in
general, for asynchronous computations that return a nested QFuture.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QFuture] Added QFuture::unwrap() for unwrapping the
future nested inside QFuture<QFuture<T>>.
Task-number: QTBUG-86725
Change-Id: I8886743aca261dca46f62d9dfcaead4a141d3dc4
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Skip a test that uses QProcess instead of blacklisting it.
Re-enable this test in CMakeLists.txt, so that it can be checked
in the CI.
Fixes: QTBUG-87431
Pick-to: 6.3 6.2
Change-Id: If8a4acd60735f355dffa60c28b8d07695ee33ec8
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
For x86_32 the alignment of QBasicAtomicInteger<8 bytes> is not
equal to the alignment of TypeInStruct<8 bytes>, so do not perform
the check.
Fixes: QTBUG-87422
Pick-to: 6.3 6.2
Change-Id: I6e6c6cb7b2b7195e430d6a6991004bcfce16d4cb
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
If the QPromise is being destroyed, we should signal the associated
futures to stop waiting. No matter in which state the promise is, if
it's not finished, we should always cancel to avoid infinite waits.
This is also what docs state:
"The promise implicitly transitions to a canceled state on destruction
unless finish() is called beforehand by the user."
Fixes: QTBUG-101284
Pick-to: 6.3 6.2
Change-Id: I65ebfefe03b79b41afacda78a4f49938c54d8b37
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
There is no reason to allow relock() on a locked locker, or unlock()
or an unlocked one, just like we don't allow that on a plain mutex
to begin with. The docs already said that e.g. relock() locks an
_unlocked_ locker.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QMutexLocker] QMutexLocker allowed relock() and
unlock() on an already closed (resp. open) locker object. These
semantics have always been undocumented and are now unsupported
(in both cases they yield undefined behavior.)
Change-Id: Id5f67beb5dc30d6435dae88a3085fba93ec7d96e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The class is similar to unique_lock in that it allows for unlocking
and relocking. Since the locked state is tracked by QMutexLocker itself,
it's trivial to make it movable.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QMutexLocker] The class is now movable.
Change-Id: I534044f8024575e996c12efb2236761d493798a3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Connecting to nullptr, or connecting to a non-signal PMF, would result
in a QFuture which would never finish. Catch these cases and handle
them.
Windows+MSVC for some reason fails the test. I can't entirely understand
why, so I've marked it as XFAIL, with QTBUG-101761 to track it.
Change-Id: I314980e7e9b7156d8cddd3b33d5cbf1d0bcd6116
Pick-to: 6.2 6.3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
tst_QFutureWatcher was deactivated for Android. This patch activates it.
Fixes: QTBUG-88136
Change-Id: Iead82e22d73eb15c9ecd2756eb33925910bbffc0
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
qt_internal_undefine_global_definition disables an internal global
definition that is defined by the qt_internal_add_global_definition
function for a specific target.
Remove the ability to set the custom "undefine" flag for the
definitions since it's hard to control it using the introduced
function.
Pick-to: 6.2 6.3
Task-number: QTBUG-100334
Change-Id: Ic1637d97aa51bbdd06c5b191c57a941aa208d4dc
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Restore the 'QT_NO_JAVA_STYLE_ITERATORS' and
'QT_NO_NARROWING_CONVERSIONS_IN_CONNECT' definitions for Qt
targets.
Add the function that adds global definitions for Qt targets according
to the provided scope and the target property-based switch to disable
the definition for a specific target.
Pick-to: 6.2 6.3
Task-number: QTBUG-100295
Change-Id: I28697e81f9aabc45c48d79aae1e5caea141e04e1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
If the signal passed to QtFuture::connect() takes multiple arguments,
we need to wrap the arguments in a std::tuple when reporting the result.
To detect this case we were checking if the result type of a QFuture
returned by QtFuture::connect() is a std::tuple, but this was not
correct: the result type could be a std::tuple also if the passed
signal takes a single std::tuple argument. Instead, check if the signal
takes more than one argument.
As a drive-by modified the tst_QFuture::signalConnect to use const
values for tuples used in multiple test-cases, to avoid repetition.
Fixes: QTBUG-100071
Pick-to: 6.2 6.3
Change-Id: I1ce39cf87028f36ef94a9d1a4423b0c51473afd4
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
The class is not intended for inheriting from it (see also
e502906305), so we can mark it as final
to explicitly forbid this. The tests were still using it as a base
class to clean the results during destruction, so fix them accordingly.
Task-number: QTBUG-99883
Pick-to: 6.3
Change-Id: I4a7ee3e2b462bd704e4b5a95ed733144805d6e5b
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Capturing a QFuture in the continuations attached to it results in
memory leaks. QFuture's ref-counted data can only be deleted when the
last copy referencing the data gets deleted. The saved continuation
that keeps a copy of the future (as in case of the lambda capture) will
prevent the data from being deleted. So we need to manually clean the
continuation after it is run. But this doesn't solve the problem if the
continuation isn't run. In that case, clean the continuation in the
destructor of the associated QPromise.
To avoid similar leaks, internally we should always create futures via
QPromise, instead of the ref-counted QFutureInterface, so that the
continuation is always cleaned in the destructor. Currently QFuture
continuations and QtFuture::when* methods use QFutureInterface directly,
which will be fixed by the follow-up commits.
Fixes: QTBUG-99534
Pick-to: 6.3 6.2
Change-Id: Ic13e7dffd8cb25bd6b87e5416fe4d1a97af74c9b
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Suppress the error:
C1128: number of sections exceeded ... limit: compile with /bigobj
Fix by setting the correct target in CMake script.
Pick-to: 6.2 6.3
Change-Id: If241fbaa70b68ca698dae2d484146e7bac970609
Reviewed-by: Alexey Edelev <alexey.edelev@qt.io>
Filter out the last argument of type QPrivateSignal from the signal's
arguments passed to QtFuture::connect().
Pick-to: 6.2
Fixes: QTBUG-92501
Change-Id: Idcd6baba1f01fcc94fa64b1c7030a629d01ed7a1
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
If one destroys a running QThread, so far the behavior has been to crash
(à la std::thread) -- assuming the thread hasn't already signalled that
it has finished. This behavior is hostile to solutions such as using
QThread::create(), which always require a wait() before destroying the
thread object.
We can use the opportunity to change the behavior without breaking any
valid code. Instead of crashing, inside QThread's destructor we can ask
the new thread to quit, and then join it (à la std::jthread). This
simplifies the implementation of long-living runnables and the code that
manages them.
Deploying this solution for the whole QThread class may not be entirely
painless. While no correct code would work differently with the proposed
changes, incorrect code that deletes a running thread would no longer
crash "loudly" -- instead, it might deadlock "quietly", have memory
corruptions, etc.
Hence I'm limiting this approach to only the threads created by
QThread::create(), at least for the time being. This also side-steps
perhaps the biggest problem of generalizing the approach, which is that
placing such interrupt+join logic into~QThread's destructor would cause
it to be run _after_ a QThread subclass' own destructor has run,
destroying the subclass' data members too early. This might create
an antipattern if one chooses to subclass QThread. With create(), a
subclass in question exists, and it indeed has NSDMs, but it's entirely
under our control (in fact, I'm placing the logic just in its dtor).
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThread] Destroying a QThread object created by
QThread::create() while the thread that it manages is still running will
now automatically ask that thread to quit, and will wait until the
thread has finished. Before, this resulted in a program crash. See the
documentation of QThread::~QThread() for more details.
Change-Id: Ib268b13da422e277ee3ed6f6c7b2ecc8cea5750c
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
std::function, which is used to store the type-erased continuation
lambdas, requires the passed callable to be copy-constructible. This
makes impossible to use move-only callables with continuations/handlers.
In particular, it makes impossible passing lambdas that are capturing
move-only objects. The workaround is to store the continuation lambda
inside a wrapper for the callable, which stores the move-only lambda in
a QSharedPtr and can be stored in std::function, since it's copyable.
Pick-to: 6.2
Fixes: QTBUG-98493
Change-Id: I8b7a22fcf68dc132b3c533216a7a1665e9f9fb0a
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Use variable args macros to swallow any extra commas in the
expression. To use this, the type of the exception has to be first.
Use Eddy's suggestion for a new name to avoid breaking the old macro.
[ChangeLog][QtTest] Added QVERIFY_THROWS_EXCEPTION, replacing
QVERIFY_EXCEPTION_THROWN, which has therefore been deprecated.
Change-Id: I16825c35bae0631c5fad5a9a3ace4d6edc067f83
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
We have some special handling in qt_windows.h,
use it instead of the original windows.h
Change-Id: I12fa45b09d3f2aad355573dce45861d7d28e1d77
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added QtFuture::whenAll() and QtFuture::whenAny()
functions, returning a QFuture that becomes ready when all or any of the
supplied futures complete.
Task-number: QTBUG-86714
Change-Id: I2bb7dbb4cdc4f79a7a4fd494142df6a0f93a2b39
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This change allows canceling the chain of continuations attached to a
future through canceling the future itself at any point of execution of
the chain.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][Important Behavior Changes] The chain of
continuations attached to a future now can be cancelled through
cancelling the future itself at any point of the execution of the chain,
as it was documented. Previously canceling the future would cancel the
chain only if it was done before the chain starts executing, otherwise
the cancellation would be ignored. Now the part of the chain that wasn't
started at the moment of cancellation will be canceled.
Task-number: QTBUG-97582
Change-Id: I4c3b3c68e34d3a044243ac9a7a9ed3c38b7cb02e
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Fix warning about unused variable, and use qScopeGuard to make sure that
the limit of the global threadpool is restored even if one of the tests
fail.
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I36747cb451074cceea961561478210728ed6d313
Reviewed-by: Ievgenii Meshcheriakov <ievgenii.meshcheriakov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Unify cancel and finish in QPromise destructor in a single call. This
saves us one extra mutex lock and atomic state change.
Task-number: QTBUG-84977
Change-Id: Iac06302c39a2863008b27325fcf6792d4f58c8ae
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Add startOnReservedThread that specifically releases a reserved thread
and uses it atomically for a given task. This can make a positive
number of reserved threads work.
Change-Id: I4bd1dced24bb46fcb365f12cbc9c7905dc66cdf1
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Don't bother overwaiting in waitForDone(), if it was done at one point
after it was called we can return true. And do not stop threads recently
awakened by a startThread call as they have tasks to do.
Make allowing at least one thread regardless of reservation more
standard instead of hacked in certain places.
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I304bcdc5822f440d5e72fc33ba2aa1678c9ba0d0
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Testlib is not thread safe. Store the status into variable and check
it in the main thread instead.
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I840c8a3dceb1115a1b81ffeaa0fab96f9d2f1ff0
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Unix QThread implementation stores pthread_t as a system thread ID
when the thread is created, but never resets the system ID when
those threads are destroyed. Some implementations may reuse the
same thread IDs for new threads, and this may cause QThread::wait()
to erroneously complain that "Thread tried to wait on itself".
This patch sets the system thread ID to nullptr when the thread is
about to exit and be destroyed by the system.
A regression test is added to tst_qthread.
Fixes: QTBUG-96846
Pick-to: 5.15 6.2
Change-Id: I0850425dd0e09af50e59c9038e7e662a2a624beb
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
- process environment/DNS are OFF for INTEGRITY
Task-number: QTBUG-96176
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I189a97f88c96a428586c31a66b8d250e04482900
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
This ensures that a command such as
$ ninja tst_qlocale && ninja tst_qlocale_check
will automagically build the syslocaleapp program that the test runs
from a subtest. Similar for testlib's selftests and tst_QProcess.
As a drive-by, pruned some legacy comments from when CMakeLists.txt
files were generated from .pro files.
Change-Id: I67691a8175aaef124d4104cf1898193993408bdf
Reviewed-by: Alexey Edelev <alexey.edelev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Ensure that expired threads have actually finished before attempting
to restart them. Calling start() on a thread that is not yet finished
does nothing.
Add a regression test into tst_qthreadpool that attempts to trigger
reuse of expired threads and verifies that all submitted tasks
execute.
Fixes: QTBUG-72872
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I2109b628b8a4e91491115dc56aebf3eb249646b5
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
The test is randomly failing in the CI on QEMU. Couldn't reproduce it on
the actual armv7 hardware, so most likely it's not a Qt bug.
Fixes: QTBUG-96103
Pick-to: 6.1 6.2
Change-Id: I60b7264c6ce44b3b327fdd0dbcede006717c65a6
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
In the process, actually use the constants as the size of some arrays,
instead of making [1024] arrays and then only using a few entries.
Change-Id: I9f36b322840393b8680788190cf8b40a828f4957
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
The QtConcurrent::RunFunctionTask class keeps a variable to store the
result of QtConcurrent::run when it becomes available, so that it can be
reported afterwards. This requires the result type to be
default-constructible. However there's no need in storing the result, it
can be reported immediately after it becomes available.
Pick-to: 6.1 6.2
Fixes: QTBUG-95214
Change-Id: I95f3dbff0ab41eaa81b104a8834b37d10a0d193a
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
When the test failed, it never released the blocking slot, so the
tested thread remained blocked indefinitely. Blacklisting doesn't
rescue that: the test run gets killed by Coin's watchdog.
Use a QScopeGuard() to release the clocked slot on failure.
replacing the release that was happening only on success.
As drive-by clean-up, smarten up the code a little and remove an
unused enum.
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1 5.15
Change-Id: Ie035dafe6e4b1d82aea5de38ceb31c0f7fcf81d7
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
C++20 deprecated compound volatile statements such as pre- and
post-increments, to stress that they're not atomic. So instead of
volatile i;
~~~~;
++i;
you're now supposed to write
volatile i;
~~~~;
int j = i; // volatile load
++j;
i = j; // volatile store
which matches more closely what hardware does.
Instead of fixing every use of volatile pre- or post-increment in this
fashion individually, and realising that probably a few more Qt
modules will have the same kind of code patterns in them, write
QtPrivate functions to do the job centrally.
Change-Id: I838097bd484ef2118c071726963f103c080d2ba5
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
When inserting items into the result store, a ResultItem is created,
which stores a pointer to the results list and their size. If the size
of the ResultItem is set to 0, it means that a single result is stored.
In case of trying to report results via an empty list, the size is 0, so
result store treats it as a single result.
Added checks before storing the results to make sure that the result
list isn't empty. Note that empty lists are allowed in some cases for
the filter mode, because ResultStoreBase::addResults() knows how to
handle those cases correctly.
Task-number: QTBUG-80957
Pick-to: 5.15 6.1 6.2
Change-Id: I399af4c3eef6adf82fea5df031fe9a9075006b1f
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
All the getters of QFutureWatcher are consistent with the getters of the
corresponding QFuture, except for the isFinished() method, which returns
'true' only after the finished() signal is delivered. This behavior
might be unintuitive for the users. In particular, isFinished() returns
'false', even if it's called immediately after waitForFinished().
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QFutureWatcher][Important Behavior Changes] The
QFutureWatcher::isFinished() method now indicates if the related
QFuture is finished, instead of indicating if the finished() signal was
delivered. This makes it consistent with the future that is being
watched.
Fixes: QTBUG-91048
Pick-to: 6.1 6.2
Change-Id: I6ae9b882b23e06198a82c95b026491bd480b3bf0
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The test causes frequent failures in the CI. Couldn't reproduce on
actual arm64 hardware, so it's likely to be a QEMU bug. From the
available logs it seems that all the test cases are flaky (there's a
failure even after cleanupTestCase() is called), so disable all of them.
Fixes: QTBUG-94737
Pick-to: 6.1 6.2
Change-Id: I783ec2179ba779a2c8d93351a78e8472a4f7a907
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
QMetaType now implicitly knows how to convert any QFuture<T> to
QFuture<void> without needing to manually register a converter
function.
QtWebChannel will make use of this to transparently support QFuture<T>
return types.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QMetaType] QMetaType now supports converting any
QFuture<T> to QFuture<void>.
Task-number: QTBUG-92903
Change-Id: Ied7e71be37c346cc3d2c274ffb0d91a6821ab4d4
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
For generic interop with other parts of Qt, we need to be able to
extract the type-erased internal storage of QFuture<T>. In particular,
QtWebChannel needs this to transparently support QFuture<T> as a method
return type.
Task-number: QTBUG-92903
Change-Id: I763f054656b8810d58720262d364baf42c47eb37
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Ritt <ritt.ks@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
... and C++20 std::counting_semaphore API compatibility.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QSemaphore] tryAcquire() now optionally takes a
<chrono> duration as timeout, not just int milliseconds.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QSemaphore] Added try_acquire{,_for,_until}() for
C++20 std::counting_semaphore compatibility.
Change-Id: I34b6b4bf57a54745d4b97349903d090c4995338a
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Output object name and class in QCOMPARE(). This should help
to debug flaky QWidget tests that for example check on focusWidget().
[ChangeLog][QtTestLib] QCOMPARE() now reports QObject * values by class and objectName().
Task-number: QTBUG-64446
Change-Id: Ife04e89bba04fc78d077c8f0f07af17a17c9cf8c
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
The check is over-arching. is_move_constructible is sufficient;
we don't have to support "ridiculous" types that are copiable but
have deleted move operations (such types are fundamentally broken).
This is in line with the Move* (legacy) named requirements.
Change-Id: Idc7116b39013501b9be39628a4e7afd35fe15530
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@qt.io>
The API allows users to request and check the status of various
permissions. A predefined enum class of the common permission types
on different platforms is used to allow requesting permission with
a common code. Platform specific permissions are defined only on their
relevant platform. For permissions that are not predefined, they can
be requested via a string variant of this API.
This adds the Android implementation only.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Add new API for handling app permissions with an
initial implementation for Android.
Task-number: QTBUG-90498
Change-Id: I3bc98c6ab2dceeea3ee8edec20a332ed8f56ad4f
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Even if the user (usually accidentally) sets a thread count of zero or
negative. The reporter in the bug report did
QThread::idealThreadCount() - 1 on a 1 CPU system...
Drive-by add to the documentation and the missing #include.
Pick-to: 6.1 6.0
Fixes: QTBUG-93007
Change-Id: I6cdea00671e8479b9c50fffd167807d14e030154
Reviewed-by: Samuel Gaist <samuel.gaist@idiap.ch>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
Marc Mutz
Arno Rehn
Thiago Macieira
Ahmed Essam
Ivan Solovev
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Alexey Edelev
Edward Welbourne
Ahmad Samir
Friedemann Kleint
Sona Kurazyan
Johannes Kauffmann
Konrad Kujawa
Lucie Gérard
Alexandru Croitor
Volker Hilsheimer
Fabian Kosmale
Anna Wojciechowska
Kai Köhne
Vladimir Belyavsky
Giuseppe D'Angelo
Pasi Petäjäjärvi
Andreas Buhr
Alex Trotsenko
Yuhang Zhao
Ievgenii Meshcheriakov
Tatiana Borisova
Marc Mutz
Assam Boudjelthia