Use Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X give a better error message.
If C++11 is used, you get the string in the error.
Else, clicking on the QStaticFailure error still shows you the
string in the qobject.h source code)
And report better failure if the return types do not match.
(Without the static assert, you would still have a compilation error,
but in an unrelated place, with no reference to the actual connect()
call. The error was thrown from the virtual call
QSlotObject::call, without saying where it was instantiated)
Previously the error was relying on the existence of a type inside
CheckCompatibleArguments, but the Q_STATIC_ASSERT requires a bool
(hence the introduction of CheckCompatibleArguments::value)
There also was a typo in the return value of
AreArgumentsCompatible::dummy that made that code not work, and that
error not be reported.
(Instead, the error was reported when QObjectSlot::call is instantiated)
Specialization of AreArgumentsCompatible for the void type have been
added because if the return value of a signal or slot is void, the
connection should work.
Change-Id: I5a93ec787ce2a4b94a26630ca31d5001cd294e4d
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
This field isn't used at all in qtbase, nor in any of the qt5
submodules.
Change-Id: If57d389935593f797818506a220c6a3cc04b6078
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin+qt@viroteck.net>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Commits a6ae75f92a and
6f0f9f6928 were cherry-picked in the wrong
order (despite the dependencies shown in Gerrit), causing the
QObjectData::unused bitfield to be too large.
Change-Id: I65acaa8b507f7f6f2c5735f45bd0ad8343abea54
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
QWeakPointer is superior and preferred.
Remove QMetaObject::addGuard(), QMetaObject::changeGuard(),
QMetaObject::removeGuard(), and QObjectPrivate::clearGuards().
Implement QPointer using QWeakPointer<T> instead. This changes the
behavior of QPointer in 2 ways:
- During destruction of a QWidget. Previously, the destructor of QWidget
would reset all QPointers so that they would return zero when destroying
children. Update tst_QPointer to account for this change.
- When constructing a QSharedPointer to take ownership of an object
after a QPointer is already tracking the object. Previously, the shared
pointer construction would not be affected by the QPointer, but now
that QPointer is implemented using QWeakPoiner, constructing the
QSharedPointer will cause an abort(). Fix tst_QSharedPointer by
removing the use of QPointer in the objectCast() test.
These behavior changes are documented in the QPointer class
documentation and in the changes file.
Change-Id: I92d0276219c076ece7bcb60f6e1b9120ce4f5747
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
The union in QObjectPrivate of declarativeData and
currentChildBeingDeleted shouldn't use wasDeleted to determining the
meaning of the unioned pointer. Instead, add
QObjectData::isDeletingChildren, set that in
QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren(), and only use the
currentChildBeingDeleted member when the parent's isDeletingChildren is
set.
This solves aborts seen in autotests when widgets are deleting window
children. The abort comes from QWeakPointer on the parent in the child's
close event handler (the abort checks that wasDeleted is not set).
Change-Id: I1a58449159d4a5312aad8ba12e559d05d6c43d93
Reviewed-by: Aaron Kennedy <aaron.kennedy@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
This is sent when the object's name changes.
tst_moc must be updated since the method count of QObject has changed.
The test assumed that there were 4 invokable methods in QObject. The
new signal is the 5th, which breaks the test's assumptions. Fix this
as well.
tst_QObject must be updated since the
QObjectPrivate::isSignalConnected() method only supports the first 64
signals. With the addition of this new signal, sig61() in the test
becomes the 65th signal, and will always appear connected now.
Task-number: QTBUG-13999 (related)
Change-Id: Ie87893c71a231fafa7ccf2f16102238a7be8327a
Reviewed-by: Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
These were marked as TODO items for Qt 5. Do them now. (The TODO item
was added when plural support was added back in the early Qt 4 days.)
Change-Id: I3be50bc657582db730401103d691234695784340
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
This commit also improves the related documentation a bit.
The test is copied from the test with the old syntax, but all the
connection statement are changed to use the new syntax
Change-Id: Ia5630ca4335b9f8ca6d724ae3c8750d6f0804d8e
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
This add an overload to disconnect which is symetrical to the new
syntax of connect.
It is possible to diconnect connection like this:
QObject::connect( sender, &Sender::valueChanged,
receiver, &Receiver::updateValue );
QObject::disconnect( sender, &Sender::valueChanged,
receiver, &Receiver::updateValue );
This overload only work with pointer to member function, and not static
functions or functors.
The test is copied from tst_QObject::disconnect(), just
changed the syntax of the connection and disconnection
Change-Id: Ia8f819100cb12098e32877522b97b732b1e676a8
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
QMetaCallEvent now can handle a pointer to QSlotObjectBase
Change-Id: I94da1e68ce9bb1fd96a9ae013a389552eb625faa
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
In addition to the old connection syntax, you can now connect using function pointers.
connect(sender, &Sender::valueChanged,
receiver, &Receiver::updateValue );
You can connect also to functor or C++11 lambdas
The connections are now type safe (no more problems with namespaces
or typedefs). Implicit type conversion is also supported.
The new syntax forces us to change the meaning of signal form
protected to public, in order to be able to access the signal's
address everywhere
The way it works is by introducing new overload of QObject::connect
that take function pointer as parametter. Those new overload are template
function, that are implemented inline. The actual implementation is
in QObject::connectImpl which take a QObject::QSlotObject* as parametter
for the slot. That slot object contains a virtual function which call
the slot which has to be implemented in the header as it depends on the
template parametter. So the internals of QObjectPrivate::Connection
will store this QObjectSlot* in order to be able to make the call.
You can read a full description here:
http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/New_Signal_Slot_Syntax
History of commits before it was imported on gerrit:
https://qt.gitorious.org/~ogoffart/qt/ogoffarts-qtbase/commits/qobject_connect_ptr
Thread on the mailing list:
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/pipermail/qt5-feedback/2011-August/000796.htmlhttp://lists.qt.nokia.com/pipermail/qt5-feedback/2011-September/001248.html
(The discussions on the mailing list were about trying to find a
solution that do not need making signals public, but no user friendly
solution was found)
Note: support for QueuedConnection, and the symetric QObject::disconnect is
added in another commit.
Qt::UniqueConnection is not supported yet in the new overload.
Change-Id: I67d08436b0720e7f2992be9f7e34770960fa58fa
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
From a bool to a handle to to connection.
Also added a new overload of disconnect that disconnect a handle
This is required because with the new syntax taking lambda or functors,
it is the only way to disconnect a connection (as it is impossible to
compare functors)
The new return value is QMetaObject::Connection, it is a wrapper around
the internal QObjectPrivate::Connection.
QObjectPrivate::Connection is now reference counted.
tst_qglobal.cpp:
This test set up an internal callback, and the callback do not set any
proper connection handle (and tbh, it would be hard for it to do so).
So the returned QMetaObject::Connection is invalid, and ok is false
(Internal callbacks are only used for jambi and should probably be removed)
Change-Id: I111626fb4f47efc4db5e2ea5bff9da15f08fea7b
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This is the beginning of revision history for this module. If you
want to look at revision history older than this, please refer to the
Qt Git wiki for how to use Git history grafting. At the time of
writing, this wiki is located here:
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/pages/GitIntroductionWithQt
If you have already performed the grafting and you don't see any
history beyond this commit, try running "git log" with the "--follow"
argument.
Branched from the monolithic repo, Qt master branch, at commit
896db169ea224deb96c59ce8af800d019de63f12