This function reallocates a QArrayData block with realloc() but, as
the name says, it's only valid for types that do not increase the
alignment requirements. I don't think it's worth doing this for types
that do increase the alignment requirements, since we don't know the
alignment of the pointer returned by realloc(). If the new pointer
modulo the alignment is different from the old pointer modulo the
alignment, we'd have to memmove data around, which would be quite
inefficient (realloc might have memcpy'ed already and this memmove
would copy data to nearby).
This function is intended to be used especially in QString and
QByteArray, which were already using realloc() on pointers created by
QArrayData::allocate.
Change-Id: I45b61247db2e84797ad794c1049c47a09c1fb29a
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
The first is "exact", not "more": qCalculateBlockSize. It ensures that
there's no overflow in multiplying, adding the header size or when
converting back to an int.
The second is the replacement for qAllocMore: it calculates the block
size like the first, but increases the block size to accommodate future
appends. The number of elements that fit in the block is also returned.
Task-number: QTBUG-41230
Change-Id: I52dd43c12685407bb9a6ffff13f5da09f816e667
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The C and C++ standards say it's undefined whether the preprocessor
supports macros that expand to defined() will operate as an ifdef.
Clang 3.9 started complaining about that fact.
One solution was to change QT_SUPPORTS to check for zero or one, which
means we need to change the #defines QT_NO_xxx to #define QT_NO_xxx 1.
The C standard says we don't need to #define to 0, as an unknown token
is interpreted as zero. However, that might produce a warning (GCC with
-Wundef), so changing the macro this way is not recommended.
Instead, we deprecate the macro and replace the uses with #ifdef/ndef.
Change-Id: Id75834dab9ed466e94c7ffff1444874d5680b96a
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The proper solution with qCalculateBlockSize will come for Qt 5.7.
Change-Id: Ifea6e497f11a461db432ffff14490788fc522eb7
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
From Qt 5.7 -> LGPL v2.1 isn't an option anymore, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new LGPL header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under LGPL v3)
Change-Id: I046ec3e47b1876cd7b4b0353a576b352e3a946d9
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
If the allocation fails the pointer will be 0. That is OK for free(),
but we shouldn't try to check for static data then.
Change-Id: I0a8860c9e04833e3be79f7a8a39bdaffeb488f35
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Up to now, Qt had at least 3 different implementations of the mid().
Only QString::mid implementation was not crashing on edge cases and
was protected against overflows, therefore I picked that one as the
base implementation, even if it has weird semantics for an invalid
input.
As a side effect QVector::mid was slightly optimized to not detach in
all cases (which follows current QList behavior). Documentation of
QVector::mid and QList::mid was updated to not mention "copy of data"
which could suggest that the mid() result is detached.
QStringRef::mid was fixed and now it follows general Qt behavior, by
returning a null value for a null input.
Change-Id: Ie9ff5d98372bd193d66508e6dd92b6ed1180ad9b
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The ability to set a container to be unsharable has very little use and
it costs us an extra conditional for every refcount up and possibly
down.
This change is a no-op for current Qt 5. It shuffles a few things around
just so Qt can compile if you define QT_NO_UNSHARABLE_CONTAINERS. That
is done to ease the fixing of the code in Qt 6 and to make my life
easier: I'll keep that defined in my local Qt build so I can catch any
misuses of this deprecated API.
The newly deprecated methods are not marked QT_DEPRECATED because the
bootstrapped tools wouldn't build -- they're built with QT_NO_DEPRECATED
defined, which causes build errors.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] The setSharable() and isSharable() functions in Qt
containers has been deprecated and will be removed in Qt 6. New
applications should not use this feature, while old applications that
may be using this (undocumented) feature should port away from it.
Discussed-on: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-February/015724.html
Change-Id: I789771743dcaed6a43eccd99382f8b3ffa61e479
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
It's perfectly correct to leave members uninitialised, since they are zero initialized.
Change-Id: I0d0c737cf35793a2633d44ce194af7f489903c03
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com>
Change copyrights and license headers from Nokia to Digia
Change-Id: If1cc974286d29fd01ec6c19dd4719a67f4c3f00e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sergio.ahumada@digia.com>
Statics should not be deleted, the assert shows a nicer debug
information then a segmentation fault.
Change-Id: I9eedbfa966d7865fd7bb1e130c79e40bae3526cb
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This is meant to reduce the number of allocations on growing containers.
It serves the same purpose as the existing qAllocMore which is currently
used by container classes.
While only a container knows when it is growing, it doesn't need to care
how that information is used. qAllocMore is currently treated as a
black-box and its result is (basically) forwarded blindly to an allocate
function. In that respect, container code using qAllocMore acts as an
intermediary.
By merging that functionality in the allocate function itself we offer
the same benefits without the intermediaries, allowing for simpler code
and centralized decisions on memory allocation.
Once all users of qAllocMore get ported to QArrayData and
QArrayData::allocate, qAllocMore can be moved or more closely integrated
into qarraydata.cpp and qtools_p.h can be dropped.
Change-Id: I4c09bf7df274b45c399082fc7113a18e4641c5f0
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
- Updated copyright year, per 1fdfc2abfe
- Updated contact information, 629d6eda5c
- Drop "All rights reserved", 5635823e17
(Empty line added to maintain license header line count)
Change-Id: Ie401e2b6e40a4b79f4191377dd50dc60be801e1f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The behavior of Q_CHECK_PTR is user-configurable. It may throw and
exception, output a warning or be a no-op. As such, its best used in
inline code that gets compiled into the user application.
Moving it out of the QArrayData API also enables this to be used in code
that must handle out-of-memory errors without crashing or otherwise
issuing warnings.
Putting in QArrayDataPointer gives good convenience coverage for those
who are implementing containers on top of the QArrayData stack, and
covers its use in the SimpleVector test case. It intentionally leaves
out the use of allocate to access the (hidden) shared-empties which
don't really allocate, anyway (in QArrayDataPointer::clear and
setSharable).
The autotest is not updated and will have to make do without the
Q_CHECK_PTR "protection". I think that is ok.
Change-Id: Idcad909903a9807866bf23ace89f1bf1edc53c3b
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This propagates changes in b08daaedd4 to
this branch.
Change-Id: I3b72f53c7b24d27075ea8593c347b504bfd8f581
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin+qt@viroteck.net>
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
By default, QTypedArrayData::fromRawData provides the same semantics as
already exist in QByteArray and QString (immutable, sharable data), but
more combinations are possible. In particular, immutable-unsharable
leaves the data owner in control of its lifetime by forcing deep copies.
As part of this, a new isMutable property is introduced in QArrayData.
This could be taken to be implicit in statics that are initialized with
a proper size but with alloc set to 0. QStringLiteral and QByteLiteral
already did this, forcing re-allocations on resize even before the
(static, thus shared) ref-count is considered.
The isMutable property detaches data mutability and shared status, which
are orthogonal concepts (at least in the unshared state). For the time
being, there is no API to explicitly (re)set mutability, but statics and
RawData mark data immutable.
Change-Id: I33a995a35e1c3d7a12391b1d7c36095aa28e221a
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin+qt@viroteck.net>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This approach is better for future ABI evolution than using individual
bool parameters. QArrayData now also offers to calculate allocate
options for typical detach and clone operations: the CapacityReserved
flag is preserved, while cloning resets the Unsharable state.
Change-Id: I256e135adcf27a52a5c7d6130069c35c8b946bc3
Reviewed-by: João Abecasis <joao.abecasis@nokia.com>
They still exist and help avoid allocation of "empty" array headers, but
they're no longer part of the public API, thus reducing relocatable
symbols and relocations in inline code.
This means an extra non-inline call on QArrayDataPointer::clear and
setSharable operations, which are (expensive) detaching operations,
anyway.
Change-Id: Iea804e5ddc8af55ebc0951ca17a7a4e8401abc55
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Making use of the same feature added in RefCount.
To keep with the intention of avoiding the allocation of "empty" array
headers, this introduces an unsharable_empty, which allows users to
maintain the "unsharable bit" on empty containers, without imposing any
actual allocations.
(Before anyone asks, there is no point to a zero-sized capacity-reserved
container so no other combinations are needed for now.)
Change-Id: Icaa40ac3100ad954fdc20dee0c991861136a5b19
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
This was only being used to initialize static read-only RefCount
instances, where the value is hard-wired to -1. Instead of allowing
initialization with arbitrary values (which for a reference count can be
error prone) the intent of the macro is made explicit with its
replacement Q_REFCOUNT_INITIALIZE_STATIC.
Change-Id: I5b0f3f1eb58c3d010e49e9259ff4d06cbab2fd35
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
, and make it strictly a POD struct.
Since this operator was only being used to set the initial (owned) value
of the reference count, the name of the function introduced here to
replace it makes that use case explicit.
Change-Id: I2feadd2ac35dcb75ca211471baf5044a5f57cd62
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Centralizing QArrayData memory management decisions in one place will
allow us to be smarter in how we allocate header and data.
At the moment, these are allocated as a single block. In the future we
may decide to allocate them separately for "large" data or specific
alignment requirements.
For users of QArrayData this remains transparent and not part of the
ABI. The offset field in QArrayDataHeader enables this.
This also hard-wires allocation of empty arrays to return shared_empty.
Allocating detached headers (e.g., to support fromRawData) will thus
require explicit support.
Change-Id: Icac5a1f51ee7e468c76b4493d29debc18780e5dc
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
Modeled on QByteArrayData/QStringData/QVectorData, the intent is to
unify book-keeping structs for array-like data and enable sharing of
code among them.
As in those structures, size (and alloc) data member(s) specify the
number of *typed* elements the array does (and can) hold. The size or
alignment requirements of those objects is not tracked in this data
structure and needs to be maintained by its users.
Contrary to QByteArrayData and QStringData, QArrayData's offset member
keeps a *byte* offset to the actual data array and is computed from the
beginning of the struct.
Shared-null and -empty functionality is provided by QArrayData and
shared among all users.
Planned features include setSharable (force deep copies), fromRawData
(detached header and data allocations) and literals a la QStringLiteral
(static immutable instances), thus covering the functionality needed for
QByteArray, QString and QVector.
Change-Id: I9aa709dbb675442e6d06965efb8138ab84602bbd
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Thiago Macieira
Liang Qi
Jani Heikkinen
Marc Mutz
Konstantin Ritt
Ulf Hermann
Matti Paaso
Jędrzej Nowacki
Frederik Gladhorn
Mitch Curtis
Sergio Ahumada
Kai Koehne
Iikka Eklund
Jędrzej Nowacki
Friedemann Kleint
João Abecasis