When hiding a widget that has focus we try to focus the next widget in
the focus chain by running focusNextPrevChild. The abstract item view
overrides this to step the items but does not account for this hide case
which makes focusing not only not work, but also by hiding the widget
the selection in the item view gets changed.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I29d40a1fb86ced60ec742b2753a87383846a89b3
Reviewed-by: Viktor Arvidsson <viktor.arvidss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Santhosh Kumar <santhosh.kumar.selvaraj@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Since the Android emulator on CI is running without hardware accelerated
graphics, showing the widget can take almost the same time as the timeout
for exiting the app with the "wrong" exit code 1. If running on Android,
increase the timeout to 1000 ms to avoid flaky failures. Un-blacklist
tst_QApplication::abortQuitOnShow() since the random failures are
taken care of by this patch.
Task-number: QTBUG-122693
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Id52ae15b3ab2dbdaf4924b675276dfe3a4168585
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
The method removed from QWidgetList widgets in a ranged for loop.
That caused items being skipped.
Create a new list by adding positives, instead of removing negatives
from the original.
This amends b1802a164b.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6
Change-Id: I3f329290187ddc76169ababe8ffa6059d953212d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
The test has been very flaky recently. A zero timer might be processed
before the window became visible, so only start closing once the window
has been shown.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6
Change-Id: If7983723bb8abd2f3495fb21114c517289ebe8d9
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
We were handling QEvent::WindowChangeInternal, but based on what the
code is doing, what the comments say, and what QQuickWidget does,
the right event should be WindowAboutToChangeInternal.
This fixes a crash when reparenting a QRhiWidget into another widget,
where we could call removeCleanupCallback() on an RHI that was already
gone.
The fact that we have a stale RHI pointer at WindowChangeInternal time
is still problematic, and caused by our call to addCleanupCallback not
happening as it should for the first call to ensureRhi(), but this will
be fixed in a follow up.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I054120e97a24a1f74af44b2d251470792f03f7f3
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Agocs <laszlo.agocs@qt.io>
This was a feature in Qt 4, but the only platform that carried it over
to Qt 5 was Windows, in ab76593f18, and
that's still the situation.
As a first step in possibly implementing this on more platforms, lets
replace the hard-coded check in QWidgetRepaintManager::hasStaticContents
with a proper QPlatformIntegration capability check in the only call site.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I2067109f45116cd8c62facf7224cd748f19e845b
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
QWidgetPrivate::setGeometry_sys wrongly triggers full update, which is
why the test was QEXPECT_FAIL, even on Windows, which does implement
static contents.
We can test the behavior without involving the broken QWidget behavior
by resizing the QWindow instead, which triggers a resize of the platform
window and will be fed back through QWSI, similar to when the user
resizes the window via the window frame.
The QEXPECT_FAIL message for the QWidget resize has been updated to
reflect why it's expected to fail.
tst_QWidget::optimizedResize_topLevel() has similar issues to this
test, and solves it by using Window specific platform code. For now
this test has been left alone, as there are a lot more going on in
that test in terms of workarounds and blacklistings, so it needs
further investigations.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I28a55c0723b3e7f16b362d1ebc369e038d5a7ac4
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
The scroll bars may show up in one of the grabs and not the other,
(as seen on macOS), which is interesting, and possibly a bug, but
is not what the test is checking for, so let's disable the scrollbars
to stabilize the test.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Iad97ca5b22783bb1bee51b560957c5461b7d9923
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
In ccd3bf0871 we introduced code that would
ensure that our call to QWidgetPrivate::setVisible() from QWidgetWindow
would not result in WA_WState_Hidden being set. This code was later
modified in 51300566ff to apply to
widgets that were explicitly shown/hidden.
Unfortunately, the reset of the Hidden and ExplicitShowHide attributes
would in some cases result in the widget having only ExplicitShowHide
after being hidden, which is an invalid state.
It also resulted in the widget having both Visible, Hidden, and
ExplicitShowHide, if first being hidden via QWidget, and then
shown via QWindow, which in turn prevented the widget from being
hidden via QWidget::hide().
As we no longer rely on the adjustments to Hidden/ExplicitShowHide
to fix QTBUG-73021, we can remove the entire logic. Any setVisible
call to QWidgetWindow will either come from outside, in which case
we should respect that and set Visible/Hidden via QWidgetPrivate,
or the setVisible call is a result of QWidget itself (or its parent)
showing the QWidgetWindow, in which case the QWidget visible state
is already up to date and we skip the QWidgetPrivate::setVisible
call.
Task-number: QTBUG-121398
Task-number: QTBUG-73021
Fixes: QTBUG-120316
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I3174ad66b7e10c55aa99b7cb433267632169ca8f
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
When destroying a widget via QWidget::destroy(), we clear WA_WState_Created,
and then delete the QWidgetWindow, which in turn hides the widget. But
QWidgetPrivate::setVisible(false) skips hide_helper() if the widget has
not been created, which leaves out important events such as the hide
event, and even more important, fails to clear WA_WState_Visible. As
a result, the widget is left visible (and mapped), even if it has been
destroyed.
This is normally not a big issue for the main use of destroy(), namely
destructing the widget, but for cases where destroy() and create() is
used to recreate the widget this is important.
We now unconditionally call hide_helper() if the widget is not already
hidden. As a result, the widget will correctly be visible=false after a
destroy(). This in turn means we need to re-apply the visible state after
recreating the widget when we detect a mismatch in RHI configuration.
Due to our meddling of the Hidden and ExplicitShowHide attributes in
QWidgetWindow private, a QWidet::show() will not have any effect after
being destroy(). This is okey for now, as destroy() is internal to
a widget, and we make sure to either update WA_WState_Visible and
WA_WState_Hidden (in QWidgetPrivate::setParent_sys), or use the
QWidgetPrivate::setVisible() code path directly, which doesn't
have that issue. The root problem will be fixed in a follow up.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I77cb88d75e57f0d9a31741161fb14d618a653291
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
It has been passing consistently in dev, 6.7, 6.6, and 6.5 for the past
6 months: http://testresults.qt.io/grafana/goto/S35hM52IR
As a drive-by, fix comment that claims the test is only run on macOS.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I6502c40e0c39afb68a461bd530df1bacb5211dec
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
QAIV::rowsAboutToBeRemoved() closed all child editors when the child was
a direct ancestor of the removed index but forgot to check if the index
is an indirect ancestor. Some of those editors were removed later in
updateEditorGeometries() but not all as the testcase in the bug report
showed.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Fixes: QTBUG-103476
Change-Id: I90b3d3bff3857aa79f96eecf23d980928693b7bc
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
When using a style sheet, Q(Plain)TextEdit::isReadOnly() might get
called during the initialization before d->control is properly
initialized which lead to a crash.
This amends 43ce457cbd.
Fixes: QTBUG-121697
Fixes: QTBUG-121790
Task-number: QTBUG-1857
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6.2 6.6 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: I15c357c9eef7f6559bcc2ad89033a3d8e7fcbfef
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
According to QUIP-18 [1], all tests file should be
LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GPL-3.0-only
[1]: https://contribute.qt-project.org/quips/18
Pick-to: 6.7
Task-number: QTBUG-121787
Change-Id: I9657df5d660820e56c96d511ea49d321c54682e8
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
2f6fe3a268 has made calls to
QApplicationPrivate::setActiveWindow() redundant.
Remove redundant calls.
Task-number: QTBUG-121488
Change-Id: I13ea8c0994eaeb764462af23ef66ea1a37659b77
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
As a result of using QWidget::setVisible to show the child widgets we
would end up also setting ExplicitShowHide. This is not in line with
the intent of ExplicitShowHide, which is to flag a widget as explicitly
shown/hidden by the developer, which in turn prevents Qt Widgets from
toggling WState_Hidden when the widget is reparented.
By using QWidgetPrivate::setVisible instead, we can show the child
without setting ExplicitShowHide.
As side effect of this is that we no longer reset WA_WState_Hidden
from QWidgetWindowPrivate::setVisible(). This is an issue when the
setVisible call comes as a result of destroying the QWidgetWindow,
as that is an implicit hide, and should not result in the widget
having WA_WState_Hidden. QWidget handles this case in hideChildren
by not calling QWidgetPrivate::setVisible -- instead doing its own
reset of WA_WState_Visible. We don't want to untangle this just yet,
so as a workaround we detect that the widget is already !isVisible(),
thanks to hideChildren having hidden it, and then skip the call
to QWidgetPrivate::setVisible that results from QWindow::destroy().
Task-number: QTBUG-121398
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Ib5b4d9c84f0569124c5f3ca2169cabff18934e2d
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
The nativeHiddenChild is not used for anything, and shouldn't be
needed to trigger the failure condition.
That said, I was not able to reproduce the test failure on macOS
14 with the test neither pre or post patch, nor with any of the
test cases mentioned in 51300566ff,
nor with 51300566ff itself, so this
has seemingly been fixed or worked around some other way in the
meantime.
Task-number: QTBUG-121398
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I299e7f4b71ebdb17870348a3d5b0c49a93228c8b
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
We were assuming that QWidget was in full control of QWidgetWindow
destruction, via deleteTLSysExtra(), and that we could limit any
cleanups to that function.
But in some situations QWidgetWindow is destructed from other code paths,
in which case we were left with dangling pointers to the QWidgetWindow
in both QTLWExtra, as well as the backingstore.
This can happen if there's a child widget hierarchy where there is not
a 1:1 mapping between QWidgets and QWindows, for example if the window
attribute WA_DontCreateNativeAncestors has been set. In this situation
our normal recursion into children in QWidget::destroy() stops at the
first widget without a window handle. When we then delete the top level
QWindow, the QWindow destructor will delete any child QWindows, which
includes our leaf QWidgetWindow.
We should probably fix up QWidget::destroy to continue looking for
children, even if we don't destroy the current child. But independently
of that we should make sure the QWidgetWindow cleans up when it's being
deleted, regardless of how it ended up there.
There's further room to clean up the deleteTLSysExtra() function and
friends, but that's been left for a later time.
Fixes: QTBUG-120509
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.6.2 6.5
Change-Id: Ib691df164d7c9c83cb464c0a6bf3bc2116e8ca43
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Regression fix, introduced in:
7199498fb9
QPushButton with a menu will have a sunken state, QStyle::State_Sunken,
when the menu has been closed. Expected behavior is that the sunken
style is to be removed when the menu is closed.
A boolean called "menuOpen" is never set to false after being set to
true in the popupPressed() method. When this boolean is true, a sunken
state is painted.
Fixes: QTBUG-120976
Pick-to: 6.6 6.7
Change-Id: I3e721da5dfbb6db200aa2de7366ac5dc73c873e0
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
The test renders QCalendarWidget, which ends up in the QStyle code
eventually. On macOS we use a CGContext to draw the native style,
into the test's image/paint device, but CGBitmapContextCreate does
not support QImage::Format_ARGB32. It needs either a premultiplied
alpha, or no alpha at all.
The unification of the palette for the calendar, as is done for
Windows, is also needed on macOS.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I5b26e5434b84e4b14eb8784875b76810e0a14230
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][Deprecation Notices][QCheckBox]
stateChanged(int) has been deprecated in favor of
checkStateChanged(Qt:CheckState).
Found in API-review. Amends 5a96d13bb5.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I6ff4aa38c2f43622ba4b127420aff83790785455
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
4c60a11d8f had to be reverted, because it
broke restoring the state of hidden, floating dock widgets.
Extend tst_QDockWdget::hideAndShow() to test this functionality.
Blacklist test function on Apple, because Apple machines on CI show
dock widgets with the main window.
Task-number: QTBUG-120191
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Ibc6121a99f15f33d62ca0a9376dbe9fafbe20290
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Spell out some API names in enum.
Some functions are now protected.
Remove property for autoRenderTarget.
textureFormat -> colorBufferFormat.
Used "fixed" instead of "explicit" and follow
the above naming, so that explicitSize becomes
fixedColorBufferSize.
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I2fd6ad46033313a3febbb8846146021d5dd11010
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
This test is resizing window, which is not supported in EGLFS,
so it needs to be skipped.
Pick-to: 6.7
Task-number: QTBUG-115777
Change-Id: Ie136f6565b4d466bc62c4e2ebe2337488b5003b4
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Agocs <laszlo.agocs@qt.io>
Remove dead code (since at least Qt5.0) - does not work and is
bitrotting since ages.
Change-Id: Ieb34e42137bc40c4edea47656b153a47f0ae34cd
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
This test was disabled during Qt5 porting because it was unstable.
According to the discussion in the bug report, a deprecated function was
used to wait for the window to get exposed. This was later replaced by a
more robust QTest::qWaitForWindowExposed() but the test was not
re-enabled again.
Pick-to: 6.7
Fixes: QTBUG-22544
Change-Id: I3190e38c1f42dc719803a60e66a86c3773cbedcd
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
This test is resizing top window, which is not supported in EGLFS,
so this test needs to be turned off.
Pick-to: 6.7
Task-number: QTBUG-115777
Change-Id: Idb81802399fe5bd9af3f342692d2212cd06ead9c
Reviewed-by: Pasi Petäjäjärvi <pasi.petajajarvi@qt.io>
QPlainTextEditPrivate::updatePlaceholderVisibility() issued a full
viewport update, when the document became empty and the placeholder text
needed to be shown. No update was issued, when the placeholder text was
replaced by a first text character entered.
That relied on the assumption, that the placeholder text would disappear
with the first text line being rendered (even if it has just one char).
When the placeholder text covered multiple line, only the first of them
disappeared.
This patch adds a boolean to remember, that the placeholder text is
shown. If that is the case and the first char is entered, a full update
is issued, to remove all lines of the placeholder text. The boolean flag
is cleared thereafter, to avoid unnecessary viewport updates.
isPlaceHolderTextVisible() is renamed into placeHolderTextToBeShown(),
because the method returns an instruction, rather than a state.
tst_QPlainTextEdit::placeholderVisibility() is adapted to test the
boolean flag, hence the real visibility of the placeholder text.
That extends its scope to the bug at hand.
Fixes: QTBUG-119808
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: I07a7059ae619dc85d0c21247d829120e6afa7115
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Embedding a QWidget in a window container (via its windowHandle())
may cause crashes, e.g. during drag & drop and when the application
goes out of scope.
If a QWidget->windowHandle() is attempted to be embedded in a window
container, return the pointer to the widget instead of creating a
container.
Add an autotest.
Update documentation.
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][QWindowContainer] If createWindowContainer()
is called with a QWidgetWindow argument, return pointer to the
widget instead of new container.
Pick-to: 6.7
Fixes: QTBUG-119113
Change-Id: Id052a03be13adce05bbd025d86270d265dfb662e
Reviewed-by: Paul Wicking <paul.wicking@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
If a widget received a DragEnter event that it didn't accept, then the
UnderMouse widget attribute gets set. But the drag manager never got a
drag target, so the DragLeave event was never delivered, leaving the
UnderMouse attribute set incorrectly.
We always need to send DragLeave events to the receiver, even if the
DragEnter or DragMove was not accepted. Otherwise we are not in balance,
and the UnderMouse attribute will remain set.
This is a change of behavior and a very old bug, so only fixing this in
unreleased branches. Test case added to verify that explicitly generated
drag events result in the correct enter/leave events.
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][QWidget] DragLeave events are now always sent to
the widget the mouse is leaving, even if it didn't accept the DragEnter
event.
Fixes: QTBUG-50403
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I5eae49da000fb4fea81f1767f0e73a06a6b78975
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
QDialogButtonBox::layoutButtons() rebuilds the focus chain based on the
button layout. It relied on the fact that the last button in the layout
would point back to the first button. That is not the case, if
- a focus frame gets inserted in the chain, and
- the default button is not at the layout's first (=left) position.
In that case, the chain stops at the button left of the default button.
The default button can not be reached by tabbing forward. Back-tabbing
still worked.
By not "closing" the focus chain, the focus proxy was set to the first
button found in the layout. That is wrong, whenever the default button
is not at the first layout position. When the box got focus for the
first time, pressing "Enter" could lead to a non-default button being
triggered. A Yes/No message box would have No as its default button.
On Linux, it would pop up with "No" being highlighted, but "Yes" having
focus. Pressing Enter would trigger Yes, instead of No.
tst_QMessageBox::staticSourceCompat() heuristically defines the
button expected to be triggered by Enter. On Linux/KDE, it would pass,
when the wrong button was fired.
=> Always "close" the focus chain, by linking the last and first
buttons.
=> Make the default button the button box's focus proxy.
=> Change tst_QMessageBox::staticSourceCompat() to always expect No
being fired by Enter in a Yes/No box.
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][QDialogButtonBox] Default button becomes
focus proxy of a QDialogButtonBox. This ensures that Enter triggers
the default button, instead of the first button in the layout.
Fixes: QTBUG-118489
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: Ic626d3d0fe7ba8b924c21734332e98532f11c80e
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
The test function casts QMessageBox::StandardButton variables to
integers, to pass them as arguments and verify expected buttons.
In case of a test failure, this makes it hard to figure out, why a test
was failing.
Add a local macro to cast int values back to the enum before calling
qCompare(). That way the enum keys will be displayed in the logs.
Task-number: QTBUG-118489
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I23e766d5026cff3e4775db56e58f808809709e4c
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
The test was flaky, because of qWaitForWindowActive() after show().
It is not guaranteed, that a window has focus after show().
Use qWaitForWindowExposed() instead.
Task-number: QTBUG-118489
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I1eb8a73f2beafec00c4a6f6b34bfd36a8d6e4d93
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
A call to QWidget::destroy() will end up in QWindow::destroy(), which
calls QWindow::setVisible(false).
A call to QWindow::setVisible(false) on a widget's window will under
normal circumstances end up in QWidgetPrivate::setVisible(), which in
turn recurses back into QWindowPrivate::setVisible(), via
QWidgetPrivate::hide_helper(), ensuring that the QWindow internal
state is updated, visibleChanged emitted, and show/hide events sent.
Durin QWidget::destroy() we end up in QWindow::destroy(), which calls
QWindow::setVisible(false), but in this case the widget no longer has
Qt::WA_WState_Created, so the hide_helper() call is skipped, and the
corresponding QWindow is not kept in the loop.
To work around this we could have checked for windowHandle() instead
of Qt::WA_WState_Created before calling hide_helper(), but that had
many other side effects, so we opt for a more targeted fix.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I68f80e5f7df9ee811afcd274a7ee4de31a110da5
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
The tool tip content size uses an incorrect content margin, when it's
constructed. This content margin has been reset to correct value when
tool tip is positioned using placeTip(). But after that, the content
size not been recalculated.
This patch triggers updatesSize() to calculate content size with
updated content margin values.
Fixes: QTBUG-119752
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I454c8528505686f2724b897e4002f78f3049149a
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
We used to look through the event queue in QCoreApplication::postEvent,
and if we found an existing DeferredDelete event for the receiver we
would compress the two events into one.
This was changed in 99b89d30fa, as the
logic was causing O(n^2) for deleteLater, by using one of the bits
in QObjectData to track whether the object had already been deleted.
But it kept the logic for tracking this in QCoreApplication::postEvent,
and QCoreApplication::compressEvent would still do the work of deleting
the additional QDeferredDeleteEvents.
To avoid the unnecessary heap allocation of the QDeferredDeleteEvents
we can move the debouncing/compression to QObject::deleteLater().
We use the same mutex as in QCoreApplication::postEvent to guard
concurrent access to deleteLaterCalled.
A note has been added about the (preexisting) issue that the mutex
is not sufficient to prevent data races, as the deleteLaterCalled
flag is part of a bit-field, and we're not guarding any of our
other accesses to other bits.
As QDeferredDeleteEvents is private API, we can rely on no-one else
posting it than QObject::deleteLater(), which should be the case now
that tst_QApplication::sendPostedEvents() was fixed.
The documentation has been clarified as well. It's safe to call
deleteLater() more than once, but that's not _because_ other
pending events for the object are cleared. The latter behavior
is normal ~QObject() behavior. The documentation was probably
written at a point we didn't do any event compression at all
for QDeferredDeleteEvents.
Task-number: QTBUG-120124
Task-number: QTBUG-119918
Change-Id: I2a733095b7cb066ba494b1335aa40200c749cb0c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
If the commit of data to a model index result in that index getting
filtered out, then the editor will be removed as part of committing the
data, and the index that the editor is associated with becomes invalid.
The subsequent call to closeEditor() will find that the index for the
editor is no longer valid.
This should not warn, and it should also not abort the clean-up process
early. Instead, identify that the editor that we want to closed is
already hidden. In that case, skip the warning and most of the cleanup
process, and proceed directly to the EndEditHint handling further down.
Add a test that simulates the two scenarios where this can happen:
either the committing of data results in the index being filtered out
by the existing filter; or the filter changes while editing, and the
index being edited gets removed. In both cases, we don't want to see a
warning, and the state of the item view should be reset correctly.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Fixes: QTBUG-115765
Change-Id: If247172fdac9a1a9279dae96c078d32553d4ee5d
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: 🌴 Alexey Edelev 🌴 <alexey.edelev@qt.io>
When using QKeySequence::DeleteEndOfWord or
QKeySequence::DeleteStartOfWord in a QLineEdit with an existing
selection, the selection was ignored which resulted in unexpected
behavior (see bugreport). This is fixed by only setting the selection
if none exists yet.
To prevent an entry in the history when the input is empty, the
selection is checked before calling del().
Fixes: QTBUG-120006
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I2e803c5eff1f0e289e93a77c58ecd78299241da7
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
A splash screen is usually shown during initialization, before the main
window is shown. At that point, an application might not spin an event
loop. The documentation therefore recommends to run processEvents()
periodically, in order to ensure that the splash screen is actually
shown. Async window managers (e.g. XCB) might require more than one call
to processEvents() for the splash screen to be shown. It can't be
guaranteed, that a specific number of calls to processEvents() make the
splash screen visible. Calls to processEvents() are not considered
good practice in application code.
QSplashScreen::finish() uses a copy of QTest::qWaitForWindowExposed(),
to automatically close the splash screen, when the main window is
shown.
=> Re-write the static inline waitForWindowExposed to wait for the
widget's windowHandle()->isVisible(). That ensures visibility to the
window system.
The previous version waited for isExposed() to become true. That
ensured exposure to the application, but not visibility.
=> Intercept QEvent::Show and process events, until the splash screen
becomes visible.
=> Remove references to processEvents() as a requirement to show the
splash screen from the documentation. It remains a requirement for
processing mouse and keyboard events.
=> Re-activate tst_QSplashScreen and test visibility in the constructor
test function.
Drive by:
- implement switch in event override
- factor out paint event handling in a function
- update documentation about calling processEvents() to enable mouse
handling.
Fixes: QTBUG-119225
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I07910705246b4e3234e01cc4896f5bc4b2c56772
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Viktor Arvidsson
Tinja Paavoseppä
Jonas Karlsson
Chris Lerner
Volker Hilsheimer
Tor Arne Vestbø
Christian Ehrlicher
Tasuku Suzuki
Lucie Gérard
Wladimir Leuschner
Frédéric Lefebvre
Liang Qi
Ed Cooke
Marc Mutz
Axel Spoerl
Laszlo Agocs
Assam Boudjelthia
Tomasz Kozłowski
Santhosh Kumar
Johannes Grunenberg