83fce1931f
The qdatetimeparser was not tested explicitly so far, but only implicitly in tst_qdate / tst_qdatetime / tst_qdatetimeedit etc. This made it difficult to test some corner cases, especially in the context of unfinished dates, i.e. dates which are invalid, but could become valid by adding more characters. This is used to validate user input in qdatetimeedit. Task-number: QTBUG-84334 Change-Id: I27202849abb1b7cad96d3e25f7ac81ce85272b2a Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| libfuzzer | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| testserver | ||
| .prev_CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| README | ||
| tests.pro | ||
README
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.