3a72496b5c
C++20 deprecated compound volatile statements such as pre- and
post-increments, to stress that they're not atomic. So instead of
volatile i;
~~~~;
++i;
you're now supposed to write
volatile i;
~~~~;
int j = i; // volatile load
++j;
i = j; // volatile store
which matches more closely what hardware does.
Instead of fixing every use of volatile pre- or post-increment in this
fashion individually, and realising that probably a few more Qt
modules will have the same kind of code patterns in them, write
QtPrivate functions to do the job centrally.
Change-Id: I838097bd484ef2118c071726963f103c080d2ba5
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| libfuzzer | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| testserver | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| README | ||
README
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.