It was an old test written in a very low-level way, which perhaps is ok to be independent of testlib in a few tests; OTOH, it was blacklisted on a couple of platforms. Perhaps doing touch events the standard way could be more stable. While we're at it: - verify that the touch events are accepted, and thus verify the new bool return value from commit() - implement paintEvent() to help understand the layout, and touchpoint locations - remove repeated QCOMPARE lines - skip the test if window positioning fails - try to un-blacklist it, on the assumption that window positioning failure was the reason Task-number: QTBUG-87025 Task-number: QTBUG-104656 Pick-to: 6.4 Change-Id: Ie22eb24abf95cd849990a56212be87d06ce8e574 Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Doris Verria <doris.verria@qt.io> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| image | ||
| itemmodels | ||
| kernel | ||
| math3d | ||
| painting | ||
| platform | ||
| qopengl | ||
| qopenglconfig | ||
| qvulkan | ||
| rhi | ||
| text | ||
| util | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||