830fd1908b
While investigating an assertion failure I noticed that the existing tests didn't even exercise these methods for local time or zone time. Of course, we can't robustly test these time-specs, due to vagueries of offset details and zone availability, but we can at least verify that they return date-times on the specified date. Add a test-case for the start of 1900, on which the assertions were first seen; it is the earliest moment representable with tm_year >= 0, after all. One of these tests fails on 6.2 but the fix for that (as opposed to the the assertion) requires 6.3's improvements to the handling of time_t's fuller range - too risky a change to pick back to 6.2. Pick-to: 6.3 Task-number: QTBUG-99747 Change-Id: I98f5d7850a701972b2d8ea2ce203a2b3e7071354 Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org> Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| qcalendar | ||
| qdate | ||
| qdatetime | ||
| qdatetimeparser | ||
| qtime | ||
| qtimezone | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||