By templating on the <chrono> types and unconditionally using
duration_cast to coerce the duration into a milliseconds, we
allowed code such as
mutex.try_lock_for(10us)
to compile, which is misleading, since it's actually a zero-
timeout try_lock().
Feedback from the std-discussions mailing list is that the
wait_for functions should wait for _at least_ the duration
given, because that is the natural direction of variance
(tasks becoming ready to run might not get a CPU immediately,
causing delays), while an interface that documents to wait
_no more_ than the given duration is promising something it
cannot fulfill.
Fix by converting the given duration to the smallest number
of milliseconds not less than the original duration. If that
is not representable in an int, use INT_MAX, emulating the
effect of a spurious wakeup, which are allowed to happen if
the function returns false in that case.
In the above example, the try_lock_for call is now equivalent
to
mutex.tryLock(1);
The tryLock() docs state that the actual waiting time does
not exceed the given milliseconds, but fixing that is a
separate issue.
Change-Id: Id4cbbea0ecc6fd2f94bb5aef28a1658be3728e52
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
d6c8fab880