Ivan Solovev 285a2a75b4 QVariant: use comparison helper macros ... The relational operators were removed in 8652c79df0 with the argument that they do not have a total order. Back than it was a valid argument, because Qt did not support any of the C++20 ordering types. Now Qt has its own implementation for all three ordering types, so we could technically add relational operators and claim that QVariant provides partial ordering. However, that could potentially lead to many bugs and/or unexpected results, if people start using QVariant as a key in std::map/QMap containers. We do not want that to happen, so we only use the helper macros to implement (in)equality operators. This commit also extends the unit tests, providing more extensive testing of (in)equality operators and the pre-existing QVariant::compare() method. Fixes: QTBUG-113234 Change-Id: I783f3b5df552da782627f4ed0a5bb1b577753a23 Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>		2024-03-12 21:51:43 +01:00
..
stream	Remove QRegExp from QVariant	2020-05-14 12:19:47 +00:00
.gitignore	…
CMakeLists.txt	QVariant: use comparison helper macros	2024-03-12 21:51:43 +01:00
tst_qvariant.cpp	QVariant: use comparison helper macros	2024-03-12 21:51:43 +01:00