Make it consistent with other assignments.
Change-Id: If6aeb1007436e3b6a035494116786c2ab2f079ca
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Useful for QtCreator, as a replacement for
Utils::isMainThread() inside threadutils.h,
may serve for other projects, too.
Introduce static QCoreApplicationPrivate::theMainThreadId
atomic helper field holding the id of the main thread.
Change-Id: Iccc0302f423f47b5ecad86c4cd3de4d1ee36155f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This allows a more efficient way of checking whether a thread is the
currently executing one (without using private API).
Change-Id: I007edae6b258d7e42e901fa720d4f3cf9fe25a49
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Even in the original patch where the comment was added the
callouts were made with the lock held.
Change-Id: Id8d122010d2195d83ddd4fdaf638f7fc4ac8163d
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
When connecting a QFutureWatcher to the QFuture it will connect to the
output interface, which will queue up events to notify about the current
state. This happens in the thread of the QFutureWatcher.
Since 07d6d31a4c unfortunately the sending
of those events was done outside the lock, meaning the worker-thread
could _also_ send events at the same time, leading to a race on which
events would be sent first.
To fix this we move the emission of the events back into the lock
and because it is now inside the lock again anyway, we will revert
back to posting the callout events immediately, so this patch also
partially reverts 07d6d31a4c
Fixes: QTBUG-119169
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6
Change-Id: If29ab6712a82e7948c0ea4866340b6fac5aba5ef
Reviewed-by: Arno Rehn <a.rehn@menlosystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
When declaring a constructor, you must use the injected name, not a
template.
qfutureinterface.h:472:37: error: template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20 [-Werror=template-id-cdtor]
Pick-to: 6.6 6.7
Change-Id: I6818d78a57394e37857bfffd17bbbf2313001cbf
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Samir <a.samirh78@gmail.com>
SetThreadDescription is a Win32 API provided by Kernel32.dll, the only
thing that MinGW is missing is the declaration of the function. We can
provide it ourselves.
Change-Id: Iad5fc6cb7b6eb190310f5888326b65f50ddbdca8
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
On Windows the "interface" is defined as "struct".
Do not #undef it to fix a unity build.
Task-number: QTBUG-122980
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I9379c996d8b67b16a8b825af0ff3469111533291
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
It's not really clear why this feature shouldn't work in release
builds of Qt. This aligns the behavior with UNIX.
Change-Id: I6a2f50640ab0b2e109e4c3ef7317954a3e8c79a2
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Starting with Windows 10 1607 there's a modern API to set a thread's
name on Windows (replacing the RaiseException hack).
Change-Id: I45b7abef7b082b9f239b2ac948bb79cce44cdb5e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Replace fence with pause in opcode form,
as GCC doesn't support fence operand.
Amends a7f227f56c.
Remove the builtin pause checking,
as in GCC13 this will always pass,
while the opcode pause works
regardless of the pause extension.
Task-number: QTBUG-103014
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: I26e3c3b9f7d234be24abe1570aaf4c8cb3a272b3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
On this ABI, pointers are 32-bit, so Qt::HANDLE (void *) is a 32-bit
variable and the "movq" instruction is inappropriate.
There's a GCC extended inline assembler modifier for the instruction
size suffix (%z0) but Clang seems not to understand it. Instead, I just
removed the suffix: we can do that because this is a memory load
instruction, which implies the destination is a general purpose register
(also required by the "=r" constraint) and therefore the assembler can
determine the size of the memory load from the name of the selected
register.
Note: I did not verify this compiles on x32 at all, much less that it
loads the right thing from memory.
Fixes: QTBUG-122674
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6 6.7
Change-Id: I01ec3c774d9943adb903fffd17b6513d146e89ce
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
According to QUIP-18 [1], all .qdoc files should be
LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-only
[1]: https://contribute.qt-project.org/quips/18
Pick-to: 6.7
Task-number: QTBUG-121787
Change-Id: I7c4d8a1957db6f6d7ad18cbc1928499724e9305f
Reviewed-by: Kai Köhne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
This reverts commit 60113056bc. Calling
d->cond.notify_all();
without the mutex means that another thread could acquire the semaphore
(acquire the mutex, subtract from d->avail, return to caller) and
destroy it. That would mean this thread is now effectively dereferencing
a dangling d pointer.
Fixes: QTBUG-120762
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6 6.7
Change-Id: I196523f9addf41c2bf1ffffd17a96317f88b43dd
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Artem Dyomin <artem.dyomin@qt.io>
QVersionNumber, e.g., was added for Qt 5.6, the last Qt version that
didn't require C++11. So it made sense that the original documentation
stated that certain functions were only available in C++11 mode.
But already Qt 5.7 required C++11, so these historical anecdotes are
no longer pertient to today's Qt users, so remove them from the docs.
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.2 5.15
Change-Id: I5c732d3b9b33e1fb6947eff4fac546476c8379f2
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
We used deleteLater(), which was triggering ASAN use-after-free error.
Apparently, what could happen is that after the context was destroyed,
we called deleteLater(), but if at this point the previous future got
finished, we still tried to emit watcher->run() to execute the
continuation. And then the watcher got deleted.
This patch replaces deleteLater() with a plain delete call. This looks
safe, because the watcher is only accessed while holding the lock.
Amends 59e21a536f.
Fixes: QTBUG-120302
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6
Change-Id: Ia32f20bfe8daea2e2346f3d446c978ae305d2f68
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
QScopedScopeLevelCounter was added and it doesn't really need
threads to function, but apps fail to link without it.
Change-Id: I7b355369079bc11b8b8b45b3ee1bf5ba81cd1953
Reviewed-by: Piotr Wierciński <piotr.wiercinski@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
A QT_MESSAGE_PATTERN including %{backtrace depth=4} should give
the call site of the QScopedScopeLevelCounter.
Task-number: QTBUG-120124
Change-Id: Ie477994882bde9168c931479102017ad5fde426a
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
This patch replaces the QBasicFutureWatcher that was used for
continuations with context objects with a smaller QObject-based wrapper
that works directly from the actual continuation.
The idea stays the same: In order to run continuations in the thread of
a context object, we offload the continuation invocation to the
signal-slot mechanism.
Previously, we've hooked into QFuture with QFutureCallOutInterface to
emit a signal and trigger continuation invocation. However, it is much
easier and robust to emit that signal from the continuation itself.
This sidesteps the locking issues that QFutureCallOutInterface handling
presents. QFutureCallOutInterface basically requires any consumer to
only access the QFuture after all events have been posted and the
internal mutex unlocked, i.e. on the next cycle of the event loop.
Continuations do not impose this restriction; runContinuation()
explicitly unlocks the internal mutex before calling the continuation.
This fixes a deadlock when using QFuture::then(context, ...) where
the paren future is resolved from the same thread that the context
object lives in.
Fixes: QTBUG-119406
Fixes: QTBUG-119103
Fixes: QTBUG-117918
Fixes: QTBUG-119579
Fixes: QTBUG-119810
Pick-to: 6.7 6.6
Change-Id: I112b16024cde6b6ee0e4d8127392864b813df5bc
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Amends a7f227f56c.
It doesn't support that anywhere except i386, and even there it has a
different syntax than what we're using here. This code assumed ARM was
only ued with GCC-like compilers.
qglobal.c.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol asm referenced in function tst_qYieldCpu
tests\auto\corelib\global\qglobal\tst_qglobal.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Note: if we're getting here, it means the _YIELD_PROCESSOR() generic
macro was not used, which means there is no ARM YIELD being emitted for
MSVC on ARM for C code (for C++, the macro appears to be working). This
is likely to be a performance issue, which will need to be fixed by
someone who has an interest in improving performance on those
conditions.
Fixes: QTBUG-119881
Pick-to: 6.7
Change-Id: Ica7a43f6147b49c187ccfffd179f04e1ab643302
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
The compilers will only warn about using makeValueFuture from
Qt 6.10 onwards. Anyhow, for the documentation, it makes more
sense to deprecate it right now, as an alternative API is
available. So deprecate in documentation for Qt 6.6, but
mention that the compiler warning will only be shown in Qt
6.10.
While at it, also make sure the deprecation messages are
proper sentences (end with a dot).
Pick-to: 6.6
Fixes: QTBUG-116898
Change-Id: Iff90441372b788f9ea42634866d97068275bf0ca
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
This non-namespaced macro was defined in a header, and while that
header is private, we shouldn't define non-namespaced macros in our
headers.
The macro also clashed with one of the same name defined in forkfd.c,
which broke unity-builds including the forkfd_qt.cpp TU. This rename
fixes that, too, so we can now remove forkfd_qt.cpp from
NO_UNITY_BUILD_SOURCES.
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: Ic4bb4e4d7a632ca87905e48913db788a7c202314
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
When QDoc parses a project, it parses the source code to extract the
user-provided documentation and perform sanity checkings based on the
code itself on it.
When QDoc parses an "\fn" command as part of this process, it tries to
understand, based on its intermediate representation built on the
information extracted from the code-base, which "documentable element"
the "\fn" refers to.
When QDoc performs this "matching" process, it takes into consideration
only a certain amount of information.
For example, no checking is performed over the template declaration of a
callable.
Due to some upcoming documentation, where two callables are
indistinguishable to the current process, as they differ only in their
template declaration, QDoc will start to take into consideration the
template declaration of a callable when matching.
This implies that an "\fn" command should now provide information
parity, with regards to template declaration for callables, with the
code-base so that QDoc can perform the match correctly.
The documentation for some of the members of `QFutureWatcher` is not in sync
with the intended target template declaration.
Hence, add the missing information to the relevant "\fn" commands.
Task-number: QTBUG-118080
Change-Id: I33932d0ef693f6e045ecf4414d05dadfb66d3d09
Reviewed-by: Topi Reiniö <topi.reinio@qt.io>
When QDoc parses a project, it parses the source code to extract the
user-provided documentation and perform sanity checkings based on the
code itself on it.
When QDoc parses an "\fn" command as part of this process, it tries to
understand, based on its intermediate representation built on the
information extracted from the code-base, which "documentable element"
the "\fn" refers to.
When QDoc performs this "matching" process, it takes into consideration
only a certain amount of information.
For example, no checking is performed over the template declaration of a
callable.
Due to some upcoming documentation, where two callables are
indistinguishable to the current process, as they differ only in their
template declaration, QDoc will start to take into consideration the
template declaration of a callable when matching.
This implies that an "\fn" command should now provide information
parity, with regards to template declaration for callables, with the
code-base so that QDoc can perform the match correctly.
The documentation for some of the members of `QFuture` is not in sync
with the intended target template declaration.
Hence, add the missing information to the relevant "\fn" commands.
Task-number: QTBUG-118080
Change-Id: I142124e02c9264c8c1b82bb8130162ee89c0f3a5
Reviewed-by: Topi Reiniö <topi.reinio@qt.io>
This reverts commit 6a93ec2435.
Reason for revert: Breaks qtdeclarative build, submodules need
to be clean before we deprecate or remove APIs.
Change-Id: Id0726b9bfad6072065b380b44b6ff6dffda79e45
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
These special member functions have no purpose.
We never *documented* their semantics. Any code using them is
unconditionally wrong (which semantics was it assuming?), so we can
accept the SIC (type A). If a user needs such a copy, they would have to
reason on the intended semantics (relaxed? acquire/release?) and be
explicit in their code. Especially for assignment, they would need
understand the consequences of the memory ordering that apply on _each_
atomic object involved and not on the assignment operation as a whole
(there are no such semantics).
Testing this change on qtbase has already found bugs.
From a purely technical point of view: we don't guarantee lock-free
atomics nor we require them from the underlying platform. An atomic is
therefore allowed to be implemented as a mutex protecting a value, and
mutexes are not copiable. std::atomic follows the exactly same pattern
(not copiable nor copy-assignable) for exactly the same reasons, and Qt
atomics are implemented on top of std:: ones.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] The copy constructor and assignment operators of
Qt atomic classes (QAtomicInteger, QAtomicPointer) have been removed.
Their usage in user code should be considered a programming error, as no
memory ordering semantics were ever documented for these operations (and
therefore relying on any specific semantic would be relying on
undocumented, unportable behavior). This matches the API of the
std::atomic class in C++. Note that you can still use explicit
load/store operations to transfer a value across two Qt atomic objects,
and therefore use the memory ordering specified for the load/store
operations.
Change-Id: Iab653bad761afb8b3e3b6a967ece7b28713aa944
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Instead, check the macro that we're about to use. This is also done in
qprocess_unix.cpp
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6
Change-Id: I8f3ce163ccc5408cac39fffd178d657b7594d07a
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
All these TUs relied on transitive includes of qpointer.h, maybe to a
large extent via qevent.h, though, given that qevent.h is more or less
the only public QtBase header that includes qpointer.h, something else
seems to be at play here.
Said qevent.h actually needs QPointer in-name-only, so a forward
declaration would suffice. Prepare for qevent.h dropping the include.
The algorithm I used was:
If the TU mentions 'passiveGrabbers', the name of the QEvent function
that returns QPointers, and the TU doesn't have qpointer.h included
explicitly, include it. That may produce False Positives, but better
safe than sorry. Otherwise, in src/, add an include to all source and
header files which mention QPointer. Exception: if foo.h of a foo.cpp
already includes it, don't include again.
Task-number: QTBUG-117670
Change-Id: I3321cccdb41ce0ba6d8a709cea92427aba398254
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
When QDoc reads an `\fn` command it saves it to a file to parse it with
Clang, with the objective of using the produced AST to perform certain
sanity checks on the documented element.
Generally, `\fn` commands that do not represent correct C++ code are
accepted as long as Clang is still able to build an AST Node that QDoc
can work with, not resulting in any issue in the output documentation.
For example, an `\fn` that doesn't state a return type might be able to
be parsed correctly enough by Clang to produce a sensible Node for the
function that QDoc is interested into.
The documentation for `QPromise::emplaceResult/emplaceResultAt` make
use of this possibility by not stating a return type.
Up to Clang 15 this was not an issue, and a correct-enough AST was
produced when the `\fn` commands for those methods were parsed.
On Clang 16, Clang chokes on the missing return type, being unable to
recognize the function definition and produce an AST that QDoc can work
with.
This has the effect of losing those documented element in the output
documentation.
To avoid the issue, a return type is now added to the relevant `\fn`
commands.
Task-number: QTBUG-111580
Change-Id: I7d41fc52720ff8762bf2cce229969b7250e44754
Reviewed-by: Paul Wicking <paul.wicking@qt.io>
The last QPointer user was removed in commit
07d6d31a4c. Prune the include.
Change-Id: Id48ffd2f8f5c1790bbdc54d66ac0c404b0af9cd2
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
* Fix references to Wait Conditions Example, Semaphores Example, and
MIME Type Browser Example as they were renamed.
* Rename 'Shared Memory' example as its title clashes with
the title of another page (sharedmemory.html).
src/corelib/global/qfloat16.cpp:
* warning: Invalid '\relates' (already a member of 'qfloat16')
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6
Change-Id: Ia28be8e3882a7ad1fadcdbd50a657705d58526bd
Reviewed-by: Andreas Eliasson <andreas.eliasson@qt.io>
Pretty sure this is a Clang bug because the promise member that it says
is getting shadowed shouldn't be in scope (`this` isn't being captured).
qfuture_impl.h:538:60: error: declaration shadows a field of 'Continuation<Function, ResultType, ParentResultType>' [-Werror,-Wshadow]
qfuture_impl.h:327:26: note: previous declaration is here
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6
Change-Id: Ifeb6206a9fa04424964bfffd17883e21cfec6d8e
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
whenAll() and whenAny() create a shared context object which is
referenced by the continuation lambda. The refcount of context is only
correctly managed when it is copied non-const to the lambda's
capture list.
Fixes: QTBUG-116731
Pick-to: 6.6 6.6.0
Change-Id: I8e79e1a0dc867f69bbacf1ed873f353a18f6ad38
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Change the title.
Remove the first \brief as there are two briefs in the document
so that the new title makes sense with the second brief in
"All Qt Examples" doc page.
Task-number: QTBUG-108860
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I1dec2ad107e3f9ff9b4203960ba54ae6d0d8c7b6
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jaishree Vyas <jaishree.vyas@qt.io>
Change the title.
Remove the first \brief as there are two briefs in the document
so that the new title makes sense with the second brief in
"All Qt Examples" doc page.
Task-number: QTBUG-108859
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I8b0370c9a85179e172918231ae48a3c52845bf21
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Remove "Example" from the title.
Edit the link (title) to the documentation of Mandelbrot in QThread
documentation.
Delete the foreach related sentence as we are trying to port away from
this Qt pseudo-keyword.
Task-number: QTBUG-108861
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5 6.6.0
Change-Id: I6d04f24ac9c1fa1efe30a947c2da2ec7475edc80
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Notification of a conditional variable shouldn't be under the locked
mutex, as it may affect extra mutex contentions.
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6
Change-Id: Ie8429eca3f36e9a6e8e5ad2e0337bbf508f5b326
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Fix the following QDoc warnings:
* warning: Can't link to 'QRhiWidget::sampleConut'
* warning: Can't link to '`Q_NODISCARD_CTOR'
* warning: Invalid '\relates' (already a member of 'QEventLoopLocker')
* warning: Unknown command '\relatesalso'
* warning: Undocumented parameter 'separator' in QLocale::name()
* warning: clang couldn't find function when parsing \fn void QRhiWidget::framePresented()
In QAtomicPointer, work around the issue of QDoc not supporting
multiple \relates command for a single topic by adding a see-also
link to the global qYieldCpu() function.
Document the qvariant_cast() overload taking an rvalue reference.
Change-Id: I2528eee666149a97a14be059bbed537636d7aa0d
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Unix dispatcher is not used and - as such - redundant on WASM.
Change-Id: Ia8789ef783b06ce9cfba2ce9d67159db2355b594
Reviewed-by: Mikołaj Boc <Mikolaj.Boc@qt.io>
The default argument staying on the old int overload meant that on
Windows a nullary tryLock() call would need to go through both DLL-
exported functions (int, then QDeadlineTimer) and on non-Windows
platforms, it would hit the out-of-line QDeadlineTimer(qint64)
ctor.
By moving the default argument from the old to the new function, we
reduce the nullary call on Windows from two to one exported functions.
On non-Windows, we make it to hit QDeadlineTimer's constexpr inline
default ctor instead.
Found in API-review.
Amends ff9da1db0b.
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: Id3e9923cf97ee1673fe05c85c30b5a12531857b3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Everyone must have this by now. This test was 1193 ms of CMake time.
Since this was a PUBLIC feature, I've left it around with a constant
condition.
Change-Id: Ifbf974a4d10745b099b1fffd177754538bbff245
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Rewritten to be a bit simpler, added a few more yield/YieldProcessor
alternatives, added RISC-V support.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added qYieldCpu() function.
Fixes: QTBUG-103014
Change-Id: I53335f845a1345299031fffd176f59032e7400f5
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
... removing a ### comments to that effect.
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: I635ca9593ec72a66d328ff6de61cd311c1b4e89f
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>